2018
DOI: 10.1101/424192
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and characterization of variance QTLs in human induced pluripotent stem cells

Abstract: Quantification of gene expression levels at the single cell level has revealed that gene expression can vary substantially even across a population of homogeneous cells. However, it is currently unclear what genomic features control variation in gene expression levels, and whether common genetic variants may impact gene expression variation. Here, we take a genome-wide approach to identify expression variance quantitative trait loci (vQTLs). To this end, we generated single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data from i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results complement the study of Lu et al 14 Recently, Sarkar et al 13 searched for cis-acting SNPs of expression variability in another cell type: induced pluripotent stem cells, which were derived from the Yoruba LCL lines analyzed here. The authors used single-cell RNAseq, generating data on many more genes but much fewer cells as compared to flow-cytometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results complement the study of Lu et al 14 Recently, Sarkar et al 13 searched for cis-acting SNPs of expression variability in another cell type: induced pluripotent stem cells, which were derived from the Yoruba LCL lines analyzed here. The authors used single-cell RNAseq, generating data on many more genes but much fewer cells as compared to flow-cytometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is therefore important to clarify the meaning of several terms that are used hereafter. Expression variability will refer to differences in expression level of a protein between cells of the same genotype, same cell type and subtype, and which are extracted simultaneously from the same environment; given that expression variability often co-varies with mean expression, we also use the term expression dispersion of Sarkar et al 13 to refer to the amount of expression variability that is not explained by the mean; an individual will refer to a human person; variation will refer to differences of a given scalar value, for example a summary statistics of single-cell values, between individuals having different genotypes; cell line will refer to a population of immortalized cells of the same cell-type that can be propagated in vitro and which derives from a single donor individual; clone will refer to a cell line deriving from a single primary cell extracted from an individual; sample will refer to a population of cells that were cultured together in a single well and collected in a single tube for investigation.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some imputation methods such as [73,74] do model the negative binomial means per gene, which we use in our model, so these results could in principle be integrated in our model. Fourth, we did not address the power for the detection of variance QTLs from scRNAseq data [24] due to the lack of data driven priors for the effect sizes. Several practical considerations should be addressed when using our approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A genetic variant associated with the transcription of a gene is called eQTL and allows for gaining insights into the molecular underpinnings of trait associated genetic variants. Using scRNA-seq, it is now possible to identify eQTLs in a cell type specific manner [22][23][24][25] and large scale efforts are currently underway [26]. In contrast to differential expression methods, linear regression models are typically used for the detection of eQTLs even in RNA-seq data sets [20,27], after transforming the count data to a normal distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%