2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and Computer Aided Potency Optimization of a Novel Class of Small Molecule CXCR4 Antagonists

Abstract: Amongst the chemokine signalling axes involved in cancer, chemokine CXCL12 acting on chemokine receptor CXCR4 is particularly significant since it orchestrates migration of cancer cells in a tissue-specific metastatic process. High CXCR4 tumour expression is associated with poor prognosis of lung, brain, CNS, blood and breast cancers. We have identified a new class of small molecule CXCR4 antagonists based on the use of computational modelling studies in concert with experimental determination of in vitro acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, our results suggest that chemotaxis was observed in the study by Vinader et al 14 because the chemoattractant concentration was close to the K d for CXCL12-CXCR4. Conversely, as the chemoattractant concentration near the spot was much higher than the K d for EGF-EGFR, it is unlikely that true chemotaxis was observed by Wiggins and Rappoport.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, our results suggest that chemotaxis was observed in the study by Vinader et al 14 because the chemoattractant concentration was close to the K d for CXCL12-CXCR4. Conversely, as the chemoattractant concentration near the spot was much higher than the K d for EGF-EGFR, it is unlikely that true chemotaxis was observed by Wiggins and Rappoport.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The solution is generalizable for different chemoattractants and initial concentrations, but for concreteness, we focus here on cases matching the conditions used in the studies carried out by Wiggins and Rappoport 11 and by Vinader et al 14 The significant experimental parameters that were different between the two studies were the type and concentration of chemoattractant used. Wiggins and Rappoport used 5 μ M EGF; Vinader et al used 125 nM CXCL12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations