2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and fine-mapping of height loci via high-density imputation of GWASs in individuals of African ancestry

Abstract: Although many loci have been associated with height in European ancestry populations, very few have been identified in African ancestry individuals. Furthermore, many of the known loci have yet to be generalized to and fine-mapped within a large-scale African ancestry sample. We performed sex-combined and sex-stratified meta-analyses in up to 52,764 individuals with height and genome-wide genotyping data from the African Ancestry Anthropometry Genetics Consortium (AAAGC). We additionally combined our African a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of transferability of GWAS results and polygenic risk scores obtained from Europeans and American admixed populations have previously been reported (Martin et al, 2017(Martin et al, , 2019, making it important to investigate whether these SNPs are associated with GGEs in our admixed Brazilian sample. An alternative explanation for the lack of reproducibility among populations relies on the observation that only tagging SNPs are ascertained in GWAS, and the lack of replication in different populations could be due to broken linkage between the tagging SNPs and the causal variants (Akiyama et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020;Graff et al, 2021). Thus, we searched for SNPs flanking 1 Mb upstream and downstream of the candidate regions to investigate this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lack of transferability of GWAS results and polygenic risk scores obtained from Europeans and American admixed populations have previously been reported (Martin et al, 2017(Martin et al, , 2019, making it important to investigate whether these SNPs are associated with GGEs in our admixed Brazilian sample. An alternative explanation for the lack of reproducibility among populations relies on the observation that only tagging SNPs are ascertained in GWAS, and the lack of replication in different populations could be due to broken linkage between the tagging SNPs and the causal variants (Akiyama et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020;Graff et al, 2021). Thus, we searched for SNPs flanking 1 Mb upstream and downstream of the candidate regions to investigate this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation for the lack of reproducibility among populations relies on the observation that only tagging SNPs are ascertained in GWAS, and the lack of replication in different populations could be due to broken linkage between the tagging SNPs and the causal variants ( Akiyama et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Graff et al, 2021 ). Thus, we searched for SNPs flanking 1 Mb upstream and downstream of the candidate regions to investigate this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 GWAS findings have been shown to replicate across populations in a variety of common diseases, [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] suggesting sharing of common causal variants between ancestries despite differences in allele frequencies and effect sizes. 82 Furthermore, the benefit of combining population groups has been clearly demonstrated in trans-ancestry metaanalyses, [83][84][85] where differences in LD structure are specifically utilized to improve the resolution of fine-mapping. Mixed ancestry rare variant analyses are also a useful way to boost power for gene discovery through increased sample size, 86 with the 'collapsing' approach used to aggregate rare variants removing concerns regarding differing allele frequencies across population groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lead SNPs were defined within each locus if they were independent (r 2 < 0.1) and genome-wide significant (p < 510 -8 ). Novel loci were defined as those with genome-wide significance (p < 510 -8 ) and a distance > 500kb from previously published variants in European and African ancestries 10,37 . All GWAS summary statistics will be deposited in the database of genotypes and phenotypes (dbGaP) at the time of publication.…”
Section: Gwasmentioning
confidence: 99%