2009
DOI: 10.3390/s90402661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery Mechanisms for the Sensor Web

Abstract: This paper addresses the discovery of sensors within the OGC Sensor Web Enablement framework. Whereas services like the OGC Web Map Service or Web Coverage Service are already well supported through catalogue services, the field of sensor networks and the according discovery mechanisms is still a challenge. The focus within this article will be on the use of existing OGC Sensor Web components for realizing a discovery solution. After discussing the requirements for a Sensor Web discovery mechanism, an approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To make this happen, we plan to add weather sensors to the system. In addition, we will update and add new services based on new sensor web technologies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make this happen, we plan to add weather sensors to the system. In addition, we will update and add new services based on new sensor web technologies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, this line of research would include the integration of automatic metadata generation packages (Abugessaisa, 2010). Moreover, for sensor data discovery the Sensor Instance Registry (SIR) (Jirka et al, 2009) is a proposal currently being discussed at the OGC which API is feasible to be used, by the Discovery Factory, for registering sensors due to the generic design of the GSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, standards for encoding the semantics of sensor data need to be improved in order to support improved semantic interoperability. For example, Jirka et al (2009) explain that SensorML is a generic standard that allows specifying the same information through different structures, which makes it difficult to process SensorML descriptions automatically (either for semantic enrichment or semantic mapping).…”
Section: Achievements Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the standards to describe the semantics of sensors (e.g., Sensor Model Language, or Sensor ML), which play an increasingly critical role in capturing and distributing observations of phenomena in our environment, are currently not sufficient to support semantic interoperability of sensor data (Jirka et al 2009). Semantic poorness makes differences in intended meaning of data undetectable (Farrugia 2007), and refrains from finding accurate semantic mappings between semantic representations of data sources.…”
Section: Related Work On Semantic Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%