2012
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201100510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of 2‐(2‐Benzoxazoyl amino)‐4‐Aryl‐5‐Cyanopyrimidine as Negative Allosteric Modulators (NAMs) of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu5): From an Artificial Neural Network Virtual Screen to an In Vivo Tool Compound

Abstract: From ANNs to NAMs! Data from an experimental metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) high‐throughput screen (HTS) were employed to train artificial neural networks (ANNs) based on 345 confirmed negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) and 155 774 inactive compounds. This effort identified two potent mGlu5 NAMs with a unique chemotype. Optimization afforded a tool compound (shown), active in mouse models of anxiety and addiction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1C). In contrast, the potencies of mGlu 5 PAMs were often higher than their estimated affinities at the prototypical allosteric site labeled with Poon et al, 2004;Roppe et al, 2004;Chua et al, 2005;Tehrani et al, 2005;de Paulis et al, 2006;Kulkarni et al, 2006Kulkarni et al, , 2009Jaeschke et al, 2007;Milbank et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2008;Vanejevs et al, 2008;Felts et al, 2009Felts et al, , 2010Galambos et al, 2010;Rodriguez et al, 2010;Wágner et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Alagille et al, 2011;Gilbert et al, 2011;Lindemann et al, 2011;Sams et al, 2011;Weiss et al, 2011;Zou et al, 2011;Mueller et al, 2012). Dashed lines, unity; dotted lines, potency and affinity within 3-fold of each other; solid lines, 10-fold difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1C). In contrast, the potencies of mGlu 5 PAMs were often higher than their estimated affinities at the prototypical allosteric site labeled with Poon et al, 2004;Roppe et al, 2004;Chua et al, 2005;Tehrani et al, 2005;de Paulis et al, 2006;Kulkarni et al, 2006Kulkarni et al, , 2009Jaeschke et al, 2007;Milbank et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2008;Vanejevs et al, 2008;Felts et al, 2009Felts et al, , 2010Galambos et al, 2010;Rodriguez et al, 2010;Wágner et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Alagille et al, 2011;Gilbert et al, 2011;Lindemann et al, 2011;Sams et al, 2011;Weiss et al, 2011;Zou et al, 2011;Mueller et al, 2012). Dashed lines, unity; dotted lines, potency and affinity within 3-fold of each other; solid lines, 10-fold difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 H-labeled 3-methoxy-5-(pyridin-2-ylethynyl)pyridine (methoxy-PEPy) (76.3 Ci/mmol) was custom-synthesized by PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Waltham, MA). 3-Cyano-N-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl) benzamide (CDPPB), 4-nitro-N-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)benzamide (VU29), N-{4-chloro-2-[(1,3-dioxo-1,3-dihydro-2H-isoindol-2-yl)methyl]phenyl}-2-hydroxybenzamide (CPPHA), 4-butoxy-N-(2,4-difluorophenyl)benzamide (VU0357121), 2-{4-[2-(benzyloxy)acetyl]piperazin-1-yl}benzonitrile (VU0364289), 1-{[4-(2-phenylethynyl)phenyl]carbonyl}piperidin-4-ol (VU0092273), N-cyclobutyl-6-[(3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl]nicotinamide hydrochloride (VU0360172), 3-fluoro-5-[3-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]benzonitrile (VU0285683), 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylamino)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile (VU0366058), 2-[2- (3-methoxyphenyl) ethynyl]-5-methylpyridine (M-5MPEP), N- were all synthesized in-house by using previously reported methods (Kinney et al, 2005;Rodriguez et al, 2005Rodriguez et al, , 2010Chen et al, 2007Chen et al, , 2008Felts et al, 2010;Hammond et al, 2010;Zhou et al, 2010;Mueller et al, 2012). and N-tertbutyl-6-[2-(3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl]pyridine-3-carboxamide (VU0415051) were synthesized in-house by using the methods described in the supplemental materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hit rate of 28.2% was approximately 30 times greater than that of the original HTS, and the virtual screen took approximately 1 hour to complete once the model had been optimized (Fig. 16) (Mueller et al, 2012).…”
Section: Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents a more potent inhibition of tyrosinase than the current reference Computational Methods in Drug Discovery drug L-mimosine (IC 50 = 3.68 mM) (Casañola- Martin et al, 2007). Mueller et al (2012) used ANN QSAR models to identify novel positive and negative allosteric modulators of mGlu5. This receptor has been implicated in neurologic disorders including anxiety, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia (Gasparini et al, 2008;Conn et al, 2009).…”
Section: Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation