2004
DOI: 10.1894/0038-4909(2004)049<0435:doanpo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of a New Population of Devils River Minnow (Dionda Diaboli), With Implications for Conservation of the Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Garrett et al (2004), adult D. diaboli densities in Pinto Creek were quite low, suggesting declines in relative and absolute abundance. By the end of the study, most of our sample sites were dry and no D. diaboli could be found in the remaining pools despite high detection probability.…”
Section: March 2015mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to Garrett et al (2004), adult D. diaboli densities in Pinto Creek were quite low, suggesting declines in relative and absolute abundance. By the end of the study, most of our sample sites were dry and no D. diaboli could be found in the remaining pools despite high detection probability.…”
Section: March 2015mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…By the end of the study, most of our sample sites were dry and no D. diaboli could be found in the remaining pools despite high detection probability. Garrett et al (2004) found that D. diaboli were the thirdmost abundant species (10%) in the section of Pinto Creek upstream of the Texas State Highway 90 bridge, after Mexican tetra (A. mexicanus) and Tex-Mex gambusia (G. speciosa). In contrast, we found that D. diaboli adults were only 1% of the sample.…”
Section: March 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among larger karst streams, regionally endemic fishes are generally concentrated in the stenothermal, headwater sections of streams, whereas fishes with more ubiquitous distributions are generally concentrated in the more abiotically variable, downstream sections of streams (Hubbs, 1995). Because of their limited distributions in or near a spring source, these regionally endemic fishes are often described as spring-associated; however, exact factors leading to their restricted range as well as their segregation with riverine taxa remain unclear (Garrett et al, 2004). Several biotic (e.g., competition, fecundity) and abiotic (e.g., temperature, salinity, stream order, stream gradient) factors are hypothesized to regulate fish distributions and segregation among fish assemblages (Garrett et al, 2004;Gido et al, 1999;Ingersoll and Claussen, 1984;Taylor and Lienesch, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their limited distributions in or near a spring source, these regionally endemic fishes are often described as spring-associated; however, exact factors leading to their restricted range as well as their segregation with riverine taxa remain unclear (Garrett et al, 2004). Several biotic (e.g., competition, fecundity) and abiotic (e.g., temperature, salinity, stream order, stream gradient) factors are hypothesized to regulate fish distributions and segregation among fish assemblages (Garrett et al, 2004;Gido et al, 1999;Ingersoll and Claussen, 1984;Taylor and Lienesch, 1996). Among abiotic factors, constant temperature is most often identified as the explanatory variable of fish assemblage segregation in larger karst streams (Bonner et al, 1998;Gehlbach et al, 1978;Hubbs, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%