2006
DOI: 10.1086/509117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of Hard X-Ray Delays in the X-Ray Emission of the Seyfert 1 Galaxy Markarian 110: Possible Evidence of Comptonization

Abstract: We report the discovery of hard X-ray delays in the X-ray emission of the Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 110, based on a long XMM-Newton observation. Cross correlation between the X-ray light curves of different energy bands reveals an energy dependent delay ranging from a few minutes to an hour. We find that the energy spectrum can be modeled by Comptonization of disk blackbody photons. The energy dependent delay can be modeled as due to the effect of Comptonization in a hot plasma confined within 10 Schwarzschild radi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(32 reference statements)
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in very good agreement with the work of Dasgupta & Rao (2006), who did a detailed analysis of the variability during the same XMM-Newton observation. They reported the discovery of X-ray delays ranging from a few minutes to an hour between the light curves in seven selected spectral intervals (0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.42, 0.42-0.58, 0.58-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-2, and 2-12 keV).…”
Section: Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result is in very good agreement with the work of Dasgupta & Rao (2006), who did a detailed analysis of the variability during the same XMM-Newton observation. They reported the discovery of X-ray delays ranging from a few minutes to an hour between the light curves in seven selected spectral intervals (0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.42, 0.42-0.58, 0.58-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-2, and 2-12 keV).…”
Section: Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results suggests that the time lag increases with the mean energy of observed photons. A similar dependence of lag on energy has been seen in other AGNs as well and the observed lag is interpreted as Compton scattering time scale (Dasgupta & Rao 2006). If this lag is due to the process of Comptonization, we can get some useful constraints on the geometry of the inner accretion disk.…”
Section: Energy Dependent Lag From Comptonizationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…2. A Gaussian model was used to evaluate the time lags and errors are estimated using the criteria ∆χ 2 =4 (see Dasgupta & Rao 2006) (see Table 1). The mean energy is given in Table 1 is the weighted mean for all the photons in each energy band.…”
Section: Energy Dependent Lagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XMM-Newton Seyfert sample. Column (1): common name of object; Columns (2)-(4): position and redshift from NED; Column (5): Galactic absorption column from Elvis, Wilkes & Lockman (1989), Stark et al (1992) or Dickey & Lockman (1990); Column (6): references for previously published XMM-Newton spectra: (1) ; (2) Matt et al (2006); (3) Immler et al (2003) (4) Schurch et al (2006); (5) Dasgupta & Rao (2006); (6) Dewangan, Griffiths & Schurch (2003); (7) Balestra, ; (8) Awaki et al (2006); (9) Braito et al (2007); (10) Turner et al (2002); (11) Bianchi et al (2004); (12) Iwasawa et al (2004); (13) Turner et al (2005); (14) Blustin et al (2002); (15) Reeves et al (2004); (16) Uttley et al (2004); (17) Ogle et al (2004); (18) Pounds et al (2004); (19) Ponti et al (2006); (20) Schurch et al (2003); (21) Schurch et al (2004) (22) Mason et al (2003); (23) Pounds et al (2003c); (24) Turner et al (2006); (25) Miller et al (2006); (26) Vaughan et al (2005); (27) Steenbrugge et al (2003); (28) Reynolds et al (2004a); (29) Wilms et al (2001); (30) Fabian et al (2002); (31) ; (32) Gondoin et al (2001); (33) Matt et al (2001); (34) Dewangan & Griffiths (2005); (35) Pounds et al (2003b); (36) Pounds et al (2001); (37) Dadina...…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%