2010
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of Metabolic Signatures for Predicting Whole Organism Toxicology

Abstract: Toxicological studies in sentinel organisms frequently use biomarkers to assess biological effect. Development of "omic" technologies has enhanced biomarker discovery at the molecular level, providing signatures unique to toxicant mode-of-action (MOA). However, these signatures often lack relevance to organismal responses, such as growth or reproduction, limiting their value for environmental monitoring. Our primary objective was to discover metabolic signatures in chemically exposed organisms that can predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because low-molecular-weight compounds are the endpoints of metabolism and systemic functions, their in vivo levels reflect the physiological and biochemical status of the organism. Thus, their measurement has the potential to evaluate the toxicity, identify the toxic markers or organ-specific markers, and explore the metabolism-related mechanism (Nicholson et al 2002;Robertson 2005;Keun 2006; Schnackenberg and Beger 2008;Griffin and Bollard 2004;Beger et al 2010;Andreadou et al 2009;Clarke and Haselden 2008;Collings and Vaidya 2008;Hines et al 2010;Goodsaid et al 2009;Boudonck et al 2009). Although dozens of metabolomcis/ metabonomics studies have been conducted to explore toxicity and achieved fruitful results (reviewed by Beger et al 2010;Schnackenberg and Beger 2008;Robertson 2005;Keun 2006; Griffin and Bollard 2004;Collings and Vaidya 2008;Ebbels et al 2007;Clarke and Haselden 2008;Nicholson et al 2002), few of them have associated the routine toxicity data with those from metabolomics studies both in qualitative and quantitative ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because low-molecular-weight compounds are the endpoints of metabolism and systemic functions, their in vivo levels reflect the physiological and biochemical status of the organism. Thus, their measurement has the potential to evaluate the toxicity, identify the toxic markers or organ-specific markers, and explore the metabolism-related mechanism (Nicholson et al 2002;Robertson 2005;Keun 2006; Schnackenberg and Beger 2008;Griffin and Bollard 2004;Beger et al 2010;Andreadou et al 2009;Clarke and Haselden 2008;Collings and Vaidya 2008;Hines et al 2010;Goodsaid et al 2009;Boudonck et al 2009). Although dozens of metabolomcis/ metabonomics studies have been conducted to explore toxicity and achieved fruitful results (reviewed by Beger et al 2010;Schnackenberg and Beger 2008;Robertson 2005;Keun 2006; Griffin and Bollard 2004;Collings and Vaidya 2008;Ebbels et al 2007;Clarke and Haselden 2008;Nicholson et al 2002), few of them have associated the routine toxicity data with those from metabolomics studies both in qualitative and quantitative ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach has many benefits, including the potential for earlier warning, the detection of chronic effects, and increased mechanistic understanding of adverse outcomes ( Fig. 2; Fedorenkova et al, 2010;Hines et al, 2010). In particular, alterations in transcriptional gene expression (i.e.…”
Section: Future Perspectives For the Use Of Biological Effects Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, metabolomic studies in mussels were mainly addressed to discriminate and understand the mode of action of pesticides like atrazine and lindane [94], pentachlorophenol [95] and metals like copper and cadmium [95,96].…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%