2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.22.110304
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of multiple anti-CRISPRs uncovers anti-defense gene clustering in mobile genetic elements

Abstract: Many prokaryotes employ CRISPR-Cas systems to combat invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs). In response, some MGEs have evolved Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to bypass this immunity, yet the diversity, distribution and spectrum of activity of this immune evasion strategy remain largely unknown. Here, we uncover 11 new type I anti-CRISPR genes encoded on numerous chromosomal and extrachromosomal mobile genetic elements within Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas. Candidate genes were identified adjacent to anti-CR… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work will be required to test these candidates against relevant systems in the species of interest. Lastly, some of these candidate Acr proteins might inhibit other, non-CRISPR-based bacterial immune systems, given that, as recently shown, anti-defense genes show a strong tendency to cluster in MGEs 42 . The signatures of Acrs described in this work might apply broadly to inhibitors of other prokaryotic immune systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Future work will be required to test these candidates against relevant systems in the species of interest. Lastly, some of these candidate Acr proteins might inhibit other, non-CRISPR-based bacterial immune systems, given that, as recently shown, anti-defense genes show a strong tendency to cluster in MGEs 42 . The signatures of Acrs described in this work might apply broadly to inhibitors of other prokaryotic immune systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Defense systems, such as CRISPR-Cas systems ( 1 ), restriction modification systems ( 2 ), and other anti-phage systems are frequently encoded on MGEs (termed ‘defense islands’) ( 3 ) and are thus able to mobilize and spread. These defense systems and the genes they encode can protect a bacterial host from infecting phages, or conversely be co-opted by phages, allowing infecting phages to overcome bacterial host defenses ( 4 , 5 ). In addition to facilitating mobilization, MGEs are a major driver of the evolutionary adaptation of defense genes and systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we compared the prevalence of Acr in species in which the presence of CRISPR-Cas is positively or negatively correlated with the MGE content, separately considering genomes that do and do not harbor CRISPR-Cas. Because Acr are generally encoded by MGE (29) and the prevalence of MGE systematically varies across groups acting as a confounding factor, we restricted our comparisons to genomes that contain at least one prophage. Our results indicate that genomes with and without CRISPR-Cas differ in the prevalence of Acr (Fig.…”
Section: Anti-crispr Proteins Modulate Associations Between Crispr-ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 29, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02. 29.582795 doi: bioRxiv preprint At odds with the naïve expectation that defense systems should reduce the rates of HGT by interfering with the propagation of MGE, several empirical and theoretical observations suggest that the relation between defense systems and HGT might be more complex. First, the selection pressure to maintain defense systems in a population (and consequently their prevalence) generally increases with the exposure to MGE (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%