2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery, verification, and validation of walnut protein marker peptides using LC-MS approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to significant variations in the peptides used for quantification across different studies, we prioritize peptides with a higher frequency of use during the selection process. Croote and Quake provided a comprehensive summary of characteristic peptides for major allergenic foods. , Building upon this information and the most recent literature, we carefully selected two target proteins and their corresponding 2–3 peptides for each allergenic food. Subsequently, the candidate peptides underwent systematic evaluation for their MS signal intensity, specificity, recovery rate, and susceptibility to matrix effects. Ultimately, the two best-performing peptides for each food allergen were chosen for further method development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to significant variations in the peptides used for quantification across different studies, we prioritize peptides with a higher frequency of use during the selection process. Croote and Quake provided a comprehensive summary of characteristic peptides for major allergenic foods. , Building upon this information and the most recent literature, we carefully selected two target proteins and their corresponding 2–3 peptides for each allergenic food. Subsequently, the candidate peptides underwent systematic evaluation for their MS signal intensity, specificity, recovery rate, and susceptibility to matrix effects. Ultimately, the two best-performing peptides for each food allergen were chosen for further method development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%