2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancies in Liver Disease Labeling in the Package Inserts of Commonly Prescribed Medications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first aid is represented by the product information or summary of the product characteristics (in United States and Europe, respectively), which however is variable in terms of details and may also substantially differ in the labeling of liver risk[14]. The key information to be checked is the existence of contraindications in patients with pre-existing liver diseases and the presence of specific warnings on the risk of liver damage, with relevant precautions in appropriate monitoring and management.…”
Section: Suspecting and Diagnosing Dili: A Current Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first aid is represented by the product information or summary of the product characteristics (in United States and Europe, respectively), which however is variable in terms of details and may also substantially differ in the labeling of liver risk[14]. The key information to be checked is the existence of contraindications in patients with pre-existing liver diseases and the presence of specific warnings on the risk of liver damage, with relevant precautions in appropriate monitoring and management.…”
Section: Suspecting and Diagnosing Dili: A Current Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product labels (i.e., package inserts) provide some guidance as a part of the prescribing information, but they can be misleading or insufficient and focus largely on the frequency of serum enzyme elevations during therapy . In contrast, clinically significant liver injury from currently available medications is rare, and its frequency and clinical features are not reliably reported in product labels or in general reviews on the efficacy and safety of medications. Most instances of severe hepatotoxicity are first described after the medication is marketed and may be listed in the product label as a post‐marketing reported adverse event of unclear significance or relationship to the drug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, females have been predominately identified in many registries[71,76-79]. As mentioned above, much research has focused on genome-wide studies[114-116,124], and this is an area where we should be focusing our future attention. Environmental factors are poorly understood, with no definitive studies linking diet, or alcohol and coffee consumption to increased DILI risk, again illustrating a need for answers.…”
Section: Risk Factors and Natural Progression Of Dilimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver injury may be caused by most drugs, and labels often carry a warning to lower the dose in the setting of CLD[124], however, there is little evidence to support this reducing the risk for DILI[130]. As such, liver enzyme monitoring has been proposed as an option in all drugs with a high risk of hepatotoxicity[131].…”
Section: Prevention and Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%