2016
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy between FLC assays: only a problem of quantification?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, few discrepancies remained between both tests and the reason for these differences is still unknown. We confirmed that quantitative discrepancies remain between the two assays and the methods are not interchangeable in the follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy 12,16,23 .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, few discrepancies remained between both tests and the reason for these differences is still unknown. We confirmed that quantitative discrepancies remain between the two assays and the methods are not interchangeable in the follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy 12,16,23 .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In 2011, another N Latex FLC method using monoclonal antibodies was developed by Siemens (Marburg, Germany) 9 . These two assays are not entirely equivalent and seem to have limited clinical utility in detecting monoclonal gammopathy in some clinical situations, and care should be taken for interpretation if assays are switched [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a postscript to this issue, CCLM recently received an interesting Letter to the Editor about the quantitative FLC differences between Freelite and N Latex monoclonal λ FLC results [42]. Using gel chromatography and Western blotting, with and without disulfide bond reduction of the sample, the authors concluded that the Freelite assay may selectively recognize the dimeric λ FLC in a patient with MM whereas the N Latex assay appeared to recognize the monomeric form.…”
Section: Section 4: New Laboratory Assays and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%