2007
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2007.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC - head circumference, BPD - biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses

Abstract: Background: A comparison of fetal ultrasonographic biometric parameters of the head (head circumference -HC, biparietal diameter -BPD) in breech presented fetuses.Methods: Ultrasound biometry was performed in accordance with the method presented in the reference tables. In all breech presented fetuses, the HC, BPD and FL (femur length) were measured. High-risk and multiple pregnancies were excluded from the study.Results: A total of 111 ultrasonographic biometries were performed between the 31 st -38 th week o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other examples exist in the field of eye [5] and head [6] biometry for health applications. Worth mentioning in the case of eye biometry is the laser system, which provides higher accuracy and consistency than the ultrasound system.…”
Section: Sound Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples exist in the field of eye [5] and head [6] biometry for health applications. Worth mentioning in the case of eye biometry is the laser system, which provides higher accuracy and consistency than the ultrasound system.…”
Section: Sound Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of confidence interval of the values of the proximal epiphysis transverse size in stage II of IHA is, however, less than that observed in the left-sided localization. [15][16][17][18][19]21,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. In spite of the fact that the statistically established distinctions from the screening group can be viewed only in the angle between the femoral neck osseous trabeculae, the range of borders of the confidence intervals increased two times in each of the examined angulated parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported specifically on the systematic organization of the femur [13], with subdivided groups into four levels of organization and anatomical values correlating with that of the human body joints. As the anatomy of the human body is characterized by the functional predominance of the right upper and left lower limbs [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], particular actuality was acquired in studying the value of parameters at different levels involved with forming the functional asymmetry of the femur bone [13,17,18,19,20]. Furthermore, we assessed authenticated observations of a systemic anatomical study encompassing the proximal femur meta-epiphysis behavior in normal condition, particularly on the asymmetry and structural system analysis of the proximal femur meta-epiphysis regarding Osteoarticular anatomical pathology [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] Ultrasonography has been the method of choice for monitoring foetal development and condition. [2][3][4] Its use goes beyond monitoring the progress of the foetus, as sex can also be determined and abnormalities diagnosed. [5,6] Studies have shown that ovarian and cervical dimensions can be used as adjuncts in accessing maternal factors which could play a role in foetal development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%