2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy Theory Models of Satisfaction in IS Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
2
25
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Job satisfaction is a function of "the extent to which rewards actually received meet the perceived equitable level of rewards" (Porter and Lawler 1968, p. 31). Job satisfaction is somehow combined to determine overall job satisfaction (Jiang et al 2012). Previous studies disclosed that an increase in the user satisfaction of information systems would lead to positive emotions, attitudes, intentions, and behavior (Michalos, 1985).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction is a function of "the extent to which rewards actually received meet the perceived equitable level of rewards" (Porter and Lawler 1968, p. 31). Job satisfaction is somehow combined to determine overall job satisfaction (Jiang et al 2012). Previous studies disclosed that an increase in the user satisfaction of information systems would lead to positive emotions, attitudes, intentions, and behavior (Michalos, 1985).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS research has widely used ECT to investigate continued or long-term use of IT products and services (Bhattacherjee, 2001a;Bhattacherjee & Premkumar, 2004;Chiu et al, 2005) and satisfaction (McKinney, Zoon, & Zahedi, 2002;Jiang, Klein, & Saunders, 2012). ECT suggests that consumers' satisfaction with a product or service determines their repurchase intention.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach aligns with the discrepancy theory of satisfaction as described in the business, marketing, and organizational fields. Jiang, Klein, and Saunders () describe this theory as an individual's perception of a variation between an adopted anchor or benchmark in a given dimension and their understanding of accomplishment along the same dimension. When people perceive such a discrepancy they react by adjusting or dismissing the anchor or changing their prior belief about that anchor which then leads to a particular attitude or action (Jiang et al.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%