2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.871458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepant Effects of Oceanic Advection in the Evolution of SST Anomalies in the South China Sea During El Niño of Different Intensities

Abstract: Observed different evolutions of SST anomalies in the South China Sea (SCS) between super and other El Niño events are revealed. The results suggest that the first (second) warming peak is warmer than the second (first) one for super (other) El Niño composite. Mixed layer heat budget analysis indicates that during the first warming period, the vertical advection induced by the anomalous anticyclone in the SCS (SCSAC) warms the SST in the central SCS through the basin-scale downwelling motion for super El Niño … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 show that the rst abnormal warming of the SCS SST anomalies peaked around January [+ 1] is the common feature during the development and mature stages of all El Niño events, whereas the second abnormal warming peaked around August [+ 1] is unique during strong El Niño events. This nding is different from that of Xiao et al (2022), in which the SCS SST is anomalous warm in regular El Niño decaying summer even warmer than that in strong El Niño events. There are two reasons to cause the difference with Xiao et al (2022).…”
Section: Unique Second Warming Features After Strong El Niño Eventscontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 show that the rst abnormal warming of the SCS SST anomalies peaked around January [+ 1] is the common feature during the development and mature stages of all El Niño events, whereas the second abnormal warming peaked around August [+ 1] is unique during strong El Niño events. This nding is different from that of Xiao et al (2022), in which the SCS SST is anomalous warm in regular El Niño decaying summer even warmer than that in strong El Niño events. There are two reasons to cause the difference with Xiao et al (2022).…”
Section: Unique Second Warming Features After Strong El Niño Eventscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…This nding is different from that of Xiao et al (2022), in which the SCS SST is anomalous warm in regular El Niño decaying summer even warmer than that in strong El Niño events. There are two reasons to cause the difference with Xiao et al (2022). One is that they used the linear detrend method to remove the global warming effect, and the other is that they only chose the center basin of the SCS (10°N-20°N, 109°E-118°E) to do the composite eld.…”
Section: Unique Second Warming Features After Strong El Niño Eventscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The WBC also exhibits interannual-scale variability due to combined influences on the heat flux and surface circulation in the SCS (Fang et al, 2006;Chang et al, 2008;Shu et al, 2016;Xiao et al, 2022). In the southern SCS, El Niño events and local wind stress curl jointly regulate the interannual variability of the WBC (Chao et al, 1996;Wang et al, 2006a;Zu et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%