American Society for Composites 2017 2017
DOI: 10.12783/asc2017/15240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Damage Modelling of Delamination Migration in Clamped Tapered Laminated Beam Specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the implications of input property variation and scaling is also critical to application of progressive damage analysis (PDA) to design and certification of composite structures. Thus recently performed simulations of failure initiation and propagation in Clamped Tapered Beam (CTB) specimens [2] showed good agreement with experimental data for ply level transverse strength parameter obtained by using 3 point bend (3PB) test method [3] whereas the results obtained by using an almost two times lower value resulting from tensile testing of 90° coupons [4] resulted in 30% underprediction of the peak load. The goal of the present work is to introduce spatial scatter of transverse strength parameters into simulations and attempt to predict the strength of all categories of coupons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Understanding the implications of input property variation and scaling is also critical to application of progressive damage analysis (PDA) to design and certification of composite structures. Thus recently performed simulations of failure initiation and propagation in Clamped Tapered Beam (CTB) specimens [2] showed good agreement with experimental data for ply level transverse strength parameter obtained by using 3 point bend (3PB) test method [3] whereas the results obtained by using an almost two times lower value resulting from tensile testing of 90° coupons [4] resulted in 30% underprediction of the peak load. The goal of the present work is to introduce spatial scatter of transverse strength parameters into simulations and attempt to predict the strength of all categories of coupons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The main difference was that the initial matrix crack location was predicted near interface 2, at the weak singularity in the taper region, whereas in the experiments it was observed within the taper region between interface 1 and 2. Differences between "as manufactured" vs "as designed" geometry near the taper [7], and potential residual thermal stress effect have been considered as main causes for this discrepancy [23]. In addition, the simulations also predicted multiple migration attempts (vertical red lines) prior to the final migration.…”
Section: B Quasi-staticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference in CTB is the tapered edge of the short arm and the absence of initial delamination, thus allowing one to study not only the delamination migration phenomena but also the failure initiation from pristine tapered edges. Static loading of the CTB was previously considered in [2] and the present manuscript will focus on fatigue monotonic fatigue loading.…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussion of CBT including static analysis was performed in Ref [2]. CTB schematics, dimensions, boundary conditions and load application points are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Clamped Tapered Beam Specimen (Ctb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation