2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete element method to simulate the elastic behavior of 3D heterogeneous continuous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the twin nodes can also relax, they behave like the contact points of the DEM models with the advantage that the reaction forces of the twin nodes make the use of cohesive models at the interfaces between discrete elements no longer necessary to model the continuity of matter. Therefore, the reaction forces of the DECM twin nodes play the same role as the generalized forces in the cohesive beam model of the DEM approaches [23].…”
Section: How To Deal With Two-dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the twin nodes can also relax, they behave like the contact points of the DEM models with the advantage that the reaction forces of the twin nodes make the use of cohesive models at the interfaces between discrete elements no longer necessary to model the continuity of matter. Therefore, the reaction forces of the DECM twin nodes play the same role as the generalized forces in the cohesive beam model of the DEM approaches [23].…”
Section: How To Deal With Two-dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of adequate cohesion laws between particles in direct contact is of fundamental importance to obtain an accurate modeling of the continuity of matter [22]. Some recent DEM approaches describe the cohesive bonds using a cohesive beam model based on Euler/Bernoulli theory, also including coupling terms between bending and tangential effects [23]. In 3D domains, this results in a six-component vector of the generalized forces acting as attractive internal forces between two particles in contact: one normal component to counteract the relative normal displacement in traction, two tangential components to counteract the relative tangential displacements, and three moment components to prevent both bending and twisting effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally designed for granular materials [37][38][39], and extended more recently to continuous materials [40][41][42][43] the Discrete Element Method (DEM) based on spherical elements can naturally elucidate topological modifications (crack propagation, multiple cracking, crack branching, etc …), which makes it appropriate to model extrinsic reinforcement mechanisms. In contrary to cohesive zones modeling, the crack path location does not need to be predefined in DEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of adequate cohesion laws between particles in direct contact is of fundamental importance to obtain an accurate modeling of the continuity of matter [27]. Some recent DEM approaches describe the cohesive bonds using a cohesive beam model based on Euler/Bernoulli theory, also including coupling terms between bending and tangential effects [28]. In 3D domains, this results in a six-component vector of the generalized forces acting as attractive internal forces between two particles in contact: one normal component to counteract the relative normal displacement in traction, two tangential components to counteract the relative tangential displacements, and three moment components to prevent both bending and twisting effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%