2014
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete element reduced‐order modeling of dynamic particulate systems

Abstract: One of the key technical challenges associated with modeling particulate processes is the ongoing need to develop efficient and accurate predictive models. Often the models that best represent solids handling processes, like discrete element method (DEM) models, are computationally expensive to evaluate. In this work, a reduced-order modeling (ROM) methodology is proposed that can represent distributed parameter information, like particle velocity profiles, obtained from high-fidelity (DEM) simulations in a mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach involves the use of latent variables to reduce the dimensionality of data from DEM simulations combined with response surface modeling to map the process operating parameters to the distributed parameter information. The use of reduced‐order modeling in powder processing applications can enhance the accuracy of flowsheet models by incorporating information from high‐fidelity simulations such as DEM without incurring the corresponding computational costs (see Figure ).…”
Section: Areas Of Technical Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach involves the use of latent variables to reduce the dimensionality of data from DEM simulations combined with response surface modeling to map the process operating parameters to the distributed parameter information. The use of reduced‐order modeling in powder processing applications can enhance the accuracy of flowsheet models by incorporating information from high‐fidelity simulations such as DEM without incurring the corresponding computational costs (see Figure ).…”
Section: Areas Of Technical Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a limitation on the number of parameters considered is recommended before one conducts a variance‐based sensitivity analysis. This can be accomplished through screening methods (e.g., Morris screening) or a preliminary regression‐based sensitivity analysis (e.g., with the partial correlation coefficient or partial rank correlation coefficient) …”
Section: Areas Of Technical Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important parameters will have a strong contribution to the largest eigenvalues [37][38][39]. In DEM, the method was recently applied in the modelling of a continuous convective mixer [40]. Sensitivity analysis of model outputs with respect to model parameters can also be applied using the underpinning mechanistic equations which are solved in DEM simulations (e.g., Hertz-Mindlin equation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEM) simulations and equation-oriented process models. For instance, PCA-based reduced-order models have been shown to facilitate efficient and accurate representation of distributed parameter information from DEM simulations (Boukouvala, Gao, et al, 2013;Rogers & Ierapetritou, 2014). These reduced-order models evaluate in a matter of cpu-seconds (as compared with hours or even days for DEM) and are therefore much better suited to flowsheet modeling applications.…”
Section: Integration Of Reduced-order Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%