Proceedings of GeoShanghai 2018 International Conference: Fundamentals of Soil Behaviours 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0125-4_91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Element Simulation of Centrifuge Test of Dry Sand Under Dynamic Compaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porosity, Poisson's ratio and friction coe cient of these models are all 0.12, 0.3 and 0.7, respectively, which are the same to those in the reference (Li et al 2018). The numbers of particles generated by S1, S2, S3 and S4 in DC simulations were 57636, 5539, 21975 and 242800, respectively.…”
Section: And Table 2 (S1)mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The porosity, Poisson's ratio and friction coe cient of these models are all 0.12, 0.3 and 0.7, respectively, which are the same to those in the reference (Li et al 2018). The numbers of particles generated by S1, S2, S3 and S4 in DC simulations were 57636, 5539, 21975 and 242800, respectively.…”
Section: And Table 2 (S1)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The closer the measurement circle was to the tamping point, the earlier the stress wave arrived, and the earlier the stress reached the peak value. The vertical stresses reached to the peak value at 0.2 s (Li et al 2018) and attenuated at about 0.3 s. As the depth of test points increased, the difference of stress peak between the mono-sized samples (S2, S3 and S4) and the sample (S1) generated by the gradation curve became small since the in uence of DC became small and gravity became large. It can also be seen from Figs.…”
Section: Propagation Of Dynamic Contact Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations