2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Fracture Network modelling of a hydrocarbon-bearing, oblique-slip fault zone: Inferences on fault-controlled fluid storage and migration properties of carbonate fault damage zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on data collected from field surveys, the software allows one to elaborate a stochastic distribution of the fracture network. As demonstrated by Panza et al [82], who performed seeding and sensitivity analysis testing multiple configurations of DFN models, the error associated with the modalities of stochastic fracture generation provided by the software Move can be considered negligible. The required input data were, per individual set, fracture intensity, length, azimuth, dip, K-fisher value, aspect ratio, and aperture.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on data collected from field surveys, the software allows one to elaborate a stochastic distribution of the fracture network. As demonstrated by Panza et al [82], who performed seeding and sensitivity analysis testing multiple configurations of DFN models, the error associated with the modalities of stochastic fracture generation provided by the software Move can be considered negligible. The required input data were, per individual set, fracture intensity, length, azimuth, dip, K-fisher value, aspect ratio, and aperture.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, several methodologies to calculate an equivalent elastic compliance and permeability tensors have been proposed and examined (Cui et al., 2016; Huang et al., 1995; Jiang et al., 2017; Laghaei et al., 2018; J. Liu, et al., 2019; Min & Jing, 2003; Oda, 1986; Sitharam et al., 2001). Amongst the models, the crack tensor theory proposed by Oda (1986) appears to be one of the most widely employed models (Gan & Elsworth, 2016; Gutierrez & Youn, 2015; Panza et al., 2018; Rutqvist et al., 2013), because of its simplicity and a relatively small number of input parameters. The equivalent compliance tensor is calculated as below (Oda, 1986; Rutqvist et al., 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu, et al, 2019;Min & Jing, 2003;Oda, 1986;Sitharam et al, 2001). Amongst the models, the crack tensor theory proposed by Oda (1986) appears to be one of the most widely employed models (Gan & Elsworth, 2016;Gutierrez & Youn, 2015;Panza et al, 2018;Rutqvist et al, 2013), because of its simplicity and a relatively small number of input parameters. The equivalent compliance tensor is calculated as below (Oda, 1986;Rutqvist et al, 2013).…”
Section: Overall Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely used discrete fracture network (DFN) stochastic modelling tools provide statistical representation of fracture networks generally constrained by a univariate and random distribution of orientation, size, spacing and density/intensity data (Bisdom et al, 2014(Bisdom et al, , 2017aHuang et al, 2017;Panza et al, 2018). The models generated follow a local stationarity hypothesis.…”
Section: Modelling Approaches Classically Used To Model Fracture Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%