2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2016.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Optimisation for Group-Wise Cortical Surface Atlasing

Abstract: This paper presents a novel method for cortical surface atlasing. Group-wise registration is performed through a discrete optimisation framework that seeks to simultaneously improve pairwise correspondences between surface feature sets, whilst minimising a global cost relating to the rank of the feature matrix. It is assumed that when fully aligned, features will be highly linearly correlated, and thus have low rank. The framework is regularised through use of multi-resolution control point grids and higher-or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One avenue may be to explore combining hyper-alignment (Langs et al, 2010; Haxby et al, 2011), or graph matching (Ktena et al, 2016), approaches with spatially-constrained registration, such that constraints are placed to ensure that regions cannot be matched if they are very far apart in space (Iordan et al, 2016). Alternatively, in Robinson et al (2016) we propose a group-wise registration scheme that accounts for topological variation though minimisation of rank of the feature set across the group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One avenue may be to explore combining hyper-alignment (Langs et al, 2010; Haxby et al, 2011), or graph matching (Ktena et al, 2016), approaches with spatially-constrained registration, such that constraints are placed to ensure that regions cannot be matched if they are very far apart in space (Iordan et al, 2016). Alternatively, in Robinson et al (2016) we propose a group-wise registration scheme that accounts for topological variation though minimisation of rank of the feature set across the group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, there is a potential for methods such as those proposed by Wang et al (2015), which make use of use intermediate templates or (Iordan et al, 2016), which combine global spatially constrained alignment with local hyper-alignment techniques. Another possible fix might be the use of groupwise methods such as (Robinson et al, 2016), where this is performed through a discrete optimisation framework that seeks to simultaneously improve pairwise correspondences between surface feature sets, while minimising a global cost relating to the rank of the features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%