2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14051339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Terminal Super-Twisting Current Control of a Six-Phase Induction Motor

Abstract: In this manuscript, the high-accuracy stator currents tracking issue is considered for a six-phase induction motor subject to external perturbations and uncertainties due to unmeasurable rotor currents and electrical parameter variations. To achieve the control goals, the common two-cascade controllers structure is required for this type of motor. The first controller in the outer loop consists of a proportional integral to regulate the speed. Then, the second is the proposed inner nonlinear stator currents co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we exhibit the experimental performance of SMC using the same experimental test-bench as the one obtained used for the results presented in As expected, Figure 14A shows the higher Chattering of classic SMC. We can note that DSMC-ERL (Kali et al, 2019d) shows better performance than the rest in this operating point, while DTSTA (Kali et al, 2021b) has also considerably ripple in some parts. Figure 14E compares DSMC with DSTA using the mean (Kali et al, 2019a), (B) DSMC with Exponential Reaching Law (DSMC-ERL) (Kali et al, 2019d), (C) Discrete-time Super-Twisting Algorithm (DSTA) (Kali et al, 2020a) and (D) Discrete-time Terminal Super-Twisting Algorithm (DTSTA) (Kali et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Experimental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we exhibit the experimental performance of SMC using the same experimental test-bench as the one obtained used for the results presented in As expected, Figure 14A shows the higher Chattering of classic SMC. We can note that DSMC-ERL (Kali et al, 2019d) shows better performance than the rest in this operating point, while DTSTA (Kali et al, 2021b) has also considerably ripple in some parts. Figure 14E compares DSMC with DSTA using the mean (Kali et al, 2019a), (B) DSMC with Exponential Reaching Law (DSMC-ERL) (Kali et al, 2019d), (C) Discrete-time Super-Twisting Algorithm (DSTA) (Kali et al, 2020a) and (D) Discrete-time Terminal Super-Twisting Algorithm (DTSTA) (Kali et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Experimental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We can note that DSMC-ERL (Kali et al, 2019d) shows better performance than the rest in this operating point, while DTSTA (Kali et al, 2021b) has also considerably ripple in some parts. Figure 14E compares DSMC with DSTA using the mean (Kali et al, 2019a), (B) DSMC with Exponential Reaching Law (DSMC-ERL) (Kali et al, 2019d), (C) Discrete-time Super-Twisting Algorithm (DSTA) (Kali et al, 2020a) and (D) Discrete-time Terminal Super-Twisting Algorithm (DTSTA) (Kali et al, 2021b). (E) Comparative between DSMC and DSTA using Mean Squared Error (MSE) as performance parameter (Kali et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Experimental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations