2011
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete‐time adaptive control for nonlinear systems with periodic parameters: A lifting approach

Abstract: In this paper we develop a general discrete-time adaptive control approach suitable for nonlinear systems with periodic parametric uncertainties. The underlying idea of the new approach is to convert the periodic parameters into an augmented constant parametric vector by a lifting technique. The novelty of this approach is the establishment of a bridge between classical adaptive control problems and periodic adaptive control problems. As such, the well-established discrete-time adaptive control schemes can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…wherês ,̂and̂are the steps sizes of the adaptive algorithms and should be suitably chosen to ensure the stability of the adaptive algorithm [25,26].…”
Section: Modeling Of the Nonlinear Secondary Path Using Thfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…wherês ,̂and̂are the steps sizes of the adaptive algorithms and should be suitably chosen to ensure the stability of the adaptive algorithm [25,26].…”
Section: Modeling Of the Nonlinear Secondary Path Using Thfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Case 3. The true nonlinear secondary path is represented with SEF and modelled using THF without updatinĝusing (26) and (27).…”
Section: Modelling Of the Nonlinear Secondary Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of PAC arises in [17], [18], [19] due to the observation that the unknown periodic parameter remains a "constant" after a given period. Thus, the PAC approach updates the parameter estimate after the period interval, instead of carrying out the updating law continuously.…”
Section: Zjuyumiao@gmailcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the residual noise e ( k ) can be expressed as e ( k ) = x ( k ) P ( z ) S ( z ) + y ( k ) S ( z ) where y ( k ) = W ( k ) T X ( k ), the weighting parameter is W ( k ) = [ w 0 ( k ), w 1 ( k ), … , w N −1 ( k )] T and the input noise is X ( k ) = [ x ( k ), x ( k − 1), … , x ( k − N + 1)] T . The corresponding gradient estimation and adaptations of the weights are formulated as k = e 2 ( k ) W ( k ) = 2 e ( k ) [ X ( k ) S ( z ) ] . We have the adaptation as W ( k + 1 ) = W ( k ) μ k = W ( k ) 2 μ e ( k ) [ X ( k ) S ( z ) ] , where μ is the learning rate . The FXLMS algorithm in has a correction term of X ( k ) S ( z ), unlike that in the conventional least mean squares (LMS) algorithm in , W ( k + 1 ) = W ( k ) 2 μ e ( k ) X ( k ) . So, in order to realize the ANC system, the reference signal X ( k ) must be filtered by the S ̂ ( z ) , which is obtained by identifying S ( z ).…”
Section: Anc System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%