2012
DOI: 10.4310/cms.2012.v10.n3.a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation on circular domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…very long time dynamics and the potential is not a confinement potential in nonlinear optics [21,23], the simple boundary condition, such as homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann or periodic boundary condition used in the previous subsections to truncate (or approximate) the original NLSE/GPE from the whole space problem to a bounded computational domain, might bring large truncation errors except that the bounded computational domain is chosen extremely large and/or time-dependent. Thus, in order to choose a smaller computational domain which might save memory and/or computational cost, perfectly matched layers (PMLs) [60] or high-order absorbing (or artificial) boundary conditions (ABCs) [12,21,23,59,102,149,154] need to be designed and/or used at the artificial boundary so that one can truncate (or approximate) the original NLSE/GPE into a smaller bounded computational domain. Over the last 20 years, different PMLs [153,195] and/or ABCs [14,15,16,17,18,19,21,23,172,171,194] have been designed for solving the NLSE/GPE in the literatures.…”
Section: Perfectly Matched Layers And/or Absorbing Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…very long time dynamics and the potential is not a confinement potential in nonlinear optics [21,23], the simple boundary condition, such as homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann or periodic boundary condition used in the previous subsections to truncate (or approximate) the original NLSE/GPE from the whole space problem to a bounded computational domain, might bring large truncation errors except that the bounded computational domain is chosen extremely large and/or time-dependent. Thus, in order to choose a smaller computational domain which might save memory and/or computational cost, perfectly matched layers (PMLs) [60] or high-order absorbing (or artificial) boundary conditions (ABCs) [12,21,23,59,102,149,154] need to be designed and/or used at the artificial boundary so that one can truncate (or approximate) the original NLSE/GPE into a smaller bounded computational domain. Over the last 20 years, different PMLs [153,195] and/or ABCs [14,15,16,17,18,19,21,23,172,171,194] have been designed for solving the NLSE/GPE in the literatures.…”
Section: Perfectly Matched Layers And/or Absorbing Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also derived the exact artificial boundary condition for the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation by expressing the solution with Hankel's functions, implemented with a cut-off. In [21], Arnold et al proposed some discretized transparent boundary conditions for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation on a circular computational domain, and illustrated the accuracy, stability, and efficiency of the proposed method. Zhang et al [22] designed high-order artificial boundary conditions for the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation on a circular boundary by rationally approximating the kernel functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains why simulations in the literature [10,13,31] have been restricted to some picoseconds only. We solve this problem by using a fast evaluation of the discrete convolution kernel of sum-of-exponentials, which has been presented in [6] and employed in [5] on circular domains. To our knowledge, this rather new numerical technique has not been applied to realistic device simulations so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%