Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)
SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)Air Force Research Laboratory (AFMC) AFRL/RZS
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S
Pollux Drive
NUMBER(S)Edwards AFB CA 93524-7048 AFRL-RZ-ED-TP-2008-285
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited (PA #08274A).
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESFor presentation at the 26 th International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Kyoto, Japan, 21-25 July 2008.
ABSTRACTConical nozzle flows are studied for Reynolds numbers of 1,230 and 12,300 using different numerical techniques: DSMC Method, Navier-Stokes/CFD accounting for velocity slip and temperature jump boundary conditions, and statistical and deterministic approaches to the solution of BGK equation. Detailed comparisons of the stability accuracy, and convergence of the employed numerical techniques provide better understanding of their benefits and deficiencies and assists in selecting the most appropriate technique for a particular nozzle and flow application. The deterministic and statistical solutions of the BGK equation were found to be in good agreement with the benchmark DSMC results. The Navier-Stokes solution differs from the DSMC in the boundary layer. Abstract. Conical nozzle flows are studied for Reynolds numbers of 1,230 and 12,300 using different numerical techniques: DSMC Method, Navier-Stokes/CFD accounting for velocity slip and temperature jump boundary conditions, and statistical and deterministic approaches to the solution of BGK equation. Detailed comparisons of the stability, accuracy, and convergence of the employed numerical techniques provides better understanding of their benefits and deficiencies, and assists in selecting the most appropriate technique for a particular nozzle and flow application. The deterministic and statistical solutions of the BGK equation were found to be in good agreement with the benchmark DSMC results. The Navier-Stokes solution differs from DSMC in the boundary layer.