Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies

Abstract

While environmental performance of cage-based aquaculture is most often monitored through benthic conditions, there may also be requirements that necessitate discrete, pelagic sampling. In the pelagic realm, adequately capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of interest and attributing causality to aquaculture processes can be extremely challenging. Conditions are seldom ideal, and data adequacy concerns of discrete samples collected at open-water aquaculture sites are not uncommon. Further exploration of these challenges is needed. Herein, we aim to explore considerations for study design, analysis, and data interpretation of discrete pelagic sampling. As examples, we present 2 case studies where limited sampling occurred under conditions of complex pelagic dynamics. A Norwegian case study quantified particle abundance around salmon farms, and aimed to highlight the effects of spatial−temporal variation on sampling design, the need for inclusion of companion parameters, and the benefits of a priori and a posteriori data interpretation strategies. A Canadian case study collected discrete samples to measure ammonium concentrations with continuous current measurements at an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) farm, to explore issues of complex hydrodynamics, reference site suitability, sampling resolution, data pooling, and post hoc power tests. We further discuss lessons learned and the implications of study design, ambient conditions, physical processes, farm management, statistical analysis, companion parameters, and the potential for confounding effects. Pragmatic consideration of these aspects will ultimately serve to better frame the costs and benefits of discrete pelagic sampling at open-water aquaculture sites.

The effect of mussel farming on sediment dynamics in the Wadden Sea : case studies evaluating the local effects of mussel seed fisheries and mussel harvest on turbidity and sedimentation

“…To evaluate disturbance by fisheries/harvest activities it seems therefore better to use upstream values as a reference. This is in accordance with Jansen et al (2016) who conclude that in dynamic areas, gradient studies provide more insight in disturbance by (fish) aquaculture than comparing farm and reference locations.…”

“…In highly dynamic systems it is difficult to obtain representative reference values (Jansen et al 2016), especially if these are taken during different time intervals, as was done during the transect study:…”

Spatiotemporal Dispersal and Deposition of Fish Farm Wastes: A Model Study from Central Norway

“…This suggests that a complete assessment of the benthic state under a fish farm must be based on more than a few grab samples taken at large time intervals. Sampling must be dense both in time and space, though spatially discrete sampling has its obvious limitations (Jansen et al, 2016). Alternatively, instruments capable of continuously monitoring essential parameters, either directly or by proxy, could be used.…”

Performance measures and models for open‐water integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture

“…Ideally, there should be more than one reference site and these should be close enough to the farm or test location to reflect local conditions, but distant enough so as not to be influenced by the farm itself (Jansen et al . ) or by other sources of nutrients, such as rivers or waste‐water management plants (Dolenec et al . ).…”

“…; Jansen et al . ) and rarely detectable beyond 100 m at farms where formulated feeds are used (Price et al . ).…”