2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.90.025025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discreteness corrections and higher spatial derivatives in effective canonical quantum gravity

Abstract: Canonical quantum theories with discrete space may imply interesting effects. This article presents a general effective description, paying due attention to the role of higher spatial derivatives in a local expansion and differences to higher time derivatives. In a concrete set of models, it is shown that spatial derivatives one order higher than the classical one are strongly restricted in spherically symmetric effective loop quantum gravity. Moreover, radial holonomy corrections cannot be anomaly-free to thi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
71
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible solution to this problem is to implement holonomy modifications in an anomaly-free way which does not break any gauge transformations but may deform the classical structure of hypersurface deformations given in [63,64]. Consistent deformations are possible in spherically symmetric models with holonomy modifications [71,72,73,74,75,76,77], but they imply a non-classical space-time structure which is related to slicing independence only in some cases, and after field redefinitions [78,79]. The latter feature not only resolves the contradiction between holonomy modifications and covariance pointed out in [11], it also shows why singularities can be resolved in loop quantum cosmology even for matter obeying the usual energy conditions: Not only the dynamics but also space-time structure become non-classical as a consequence of holonomy modifications, unhinging the mathematical foundation of singularity theorems.…”
Section: Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution to this problem is to implement holonomy modifications in an anomaly-free way which does not break any gauge transformations but may deform the classical structure of hypersurface deformations given in [63,64]. Consistent deformations are possible in spherically symmetric models with holonomy modifications [71,72,73,74,75,76,77], but they imply a non-classical space-time structure which is related to slicing independence only in some cases, and after field redefinitions [78,79]. The latter feature not only resolves the contradiction between holonomy modifications and covariance pointed out in [11], it also shows why singularities can be resolved in loop quantum cosmology even for matter obeying the usual energy conditions: Not only the dynamics but also space-time structure become non-classical as a consequence of holonomy modifications, unhinging the mathematical foundation of singularity theorems.…”
Section: Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generic modification which does not require a specific value of γ can be obtained for the theories considered here, as has been known for some time for real variables [1,5]. Since the Hamiltonian constraint in real variables has the same form as the general spherically symmetric constraint in gauge-invariant variables, the same modification can be transferred also to self-dual type variables (γ 2 = ǫ) provided we implement it at the gauge-invariant level.…”
Section: Modified Bracketsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This modification, following [1,5], differs from the modification of [20] in that it modifies not only the constraints but also their brackets (while the latter remain closed). It therefore implies a new, non-classical space-time structure [12,13].…”
Section: Modified Bracketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not always obtain new versions of space-time: generators can be redefined so as to absorb β [17], but only if this function does not change sign anywhere. If it does, for instance at large curvature in models of quantum gravity [18,19,20], a smooth transition from ǫ = −1 to ǫ = 1 in (4) implies a passage from Lorentzian space-time to Euclidean 4-space [21,22,23]. Such a model with non-singular signature change cannot be Riemannian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%