2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-018-9576-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretization error for a two-sided reflected Lévy process

Abstract: An obvious way to simulate a Lévy process X is to sample its increments over time 1/n, thus constructing an approximating random walk X (n) . This paper considers the error of such approximation after the two-sided reflection map is applied, with focus on the value of the resulting process Y and regulators L, U at the lower and upper barriers at some fixed time. Under the weak assumption that X ε /a ε has a nontrivial weak limit for some scaling function a ε as ε ↓ 0, it is proved in particular that (Y 1 − Y (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the proof of this result is far from trivial, since it requires precise understanding of the tail function 1 − F (x, y) for large x and the rate of growth of ξ (n) t as t → ∞ (uniformly in n) among other things. The identities (7) and (8) show that the statistics T mean n and T med n are first order equivalent to the standard estimator M n , and the knowledge of the distribution of X only enters through the n −1/α -order term. This fact will prove to be important in Section 4, where the parameters of the law of X will need to be estimated.…”
Section: Limit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noted that the proof of this result is far from trivial, since it requires precise understanding of the tail function 1 − F (x, y) for large x and the rate of growth of ξ (n) t as t → ∞ (uniformly in n) among other things. The identities (7) and (8) show that the statistics T mean n and T med n are first order equivalent to the standard estimator M n , and the knowledge of the distribution of X only enters through the n −1/α -order term. This fact will prove to be important in Section 4, where the parameters of the law of X will need to be estimated.…”
Section: Limit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of scaling X 1 , M n , Δ i with n 1/α we perform the simulation of the process X on the interval [0, n], which is allowed by self-similarity of X. Furthermore, X is simulated on the grid with step-size 1/m for m = 300, which yields an approximation of X n further corrected by the easily computable asymptotic mean error m −1/α EV , see [7]. Next, we take (at most) 30 terms in the product defining H n based on the observations closest to the maximum, that is we replace it by H n (•; 15) defined in §4.2.…”
Section: Supremum For One-sided Stable Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose N = 24 and create a sample trajectory of the unrestricted Lévy walk starting from the value R(0) = 25, c.f. (24). Since X(1) = 20.5, we get Y (1) = −4.5.…”
Section: How Can One "See" L éVy Random Variables and Processes In Th...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have mentioned before that the very concept of reflection from the barrier is still under dispute in the literature on α-stable Lévy processes. Nonetheless, there is a classic proposal, introduced by Skorokhod, [21,22] which (to our surprise) seems to have never been explicitly used in the physics-oriented research, [29,30,32,40,42], and has been rather seldom mentioned in the math-oriented papers (a notable exception is the series of publications by Asmussen and collaborators, [9,[23][24][25]. see also [26][27][28]).…”
Section: How Can One "See" L éVy Random Variables and Processes In Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation