1972
DOI: 10.3758/bf03212838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminability of differences in line slope and in line arrangement as a function of mask delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
1

Year Published

1980
1980
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensory sensitivity changes produced in this study by attentional manipulation clearly refute these findings and add to contradictory evidence provided by other investigators (e.g., Beck & Ambler, 1972;Posner et al, 1978, Note 4). Beck and Ambler (1972) have suggested that the procedure in the Shiffrin and Gardner (1972) study may have precluded the operation of selective attention. In this experiment, a letter identification and localization task was compared in sequential and simultaneous conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensory sensitivity changes produced in this study by attentional manipulation clearly refute these findings and add to contradictory evidence provided by other investigators (e.g., Beck & Ambler, 1972;Posner et al, 1978, Note 4). Beck and Ambler (1972) have suggested that the procedure in the Shiffrin and Gardner (1972) study may have precluded the operation of selective attention. In this experiment, a letter identification and localization task was compared in sequential and simultaneous conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…However, in their third experiment, the sequential stimuli were presented as a pair and compared with the presentation of four simultaneous stimuli. Beck and Ambler (1972) suggest that, under experimental conditions, a subject may be able to process two and four spatial locations with equal efficiency, thus accounting for the lack of discrepancy. Shiffrin (1975) reports similar findings using a choice detection task with d' as the major dependent variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of studies, Beck (1972;Beck & Ambler, 1972 has pointed out the special role of "focal" and "distributed" attention in peripheral viewing; similar considerations almost certainly apply here, although with 1.4° eccentricity the present stimuli were within the central fovea. The properties revealed by Beck for peripheral form discrimination under uncertainty show performance dominated by extremely coarse discrete encodings: Orientation rather than configuration is the decisive factor in discrimination of simple arrangements of line stimuli.…”
Section: Two Modes Of Visual Pattern Processingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this experiment, the number of curved lines in each display was reduced to two, the duration of each display was increased to 2 sec, and there was no poststimulus mask. Under these conditions, factors related to visual processing time and distribution of attention should not set limits on performance (see, e.g., Beck & Ambler, 1972.…”
Section: Experiments 4: Acuity For Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the visual cues in a monochromatic static scene that might aid search for a target, one of the most e¡ective is line or edge orientation (Beck & Ambler 1972;Treisman et al 1977;Sagi & Julesz 1985). A line element di¡ering su¤ciently in orientation from a background of other line elements (see ¢gure 1) can be detected in a display exposed for a few tens of milliseconds before being masked: the target element is said to`pop out' (Treisman 1985;Nothdurft 1991;Wolfe 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%