2002
DOI: 10.1007/s002090100385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant and Clifford algebras

Abstract: The centralizer of a square-central skew-symmetric unit in a central simple algebra with orthogonal involution carries a unitary involution. The discriminant algebra of this unitary involution is shown to be an orthogonal summand in one of the components of the Clifford algebra of the orthogonal involution. As an application, structure theorems for orthogonal involutions on central simple algebras of degree 8 are obtained.Throughout this paper, F denotes a field of characteristic different from 2. Let A be a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, taking for A an indecomposable algebra of degree 8 yields examples where (b) holds but (a) does not (see [9,Ex. 3.6]), whereas Proposition 1.1 shows that (a) and (b) are equivalent when deg A = 12.…”
Section: Decomposabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, taking for A an indecomposable algebra of degree 8 yields examples where (b) holds but (a) does not (see [9,Ex. 3.6]), whereas Proposition 1.1 shows that (a) and (b) are equivalent when deg A = 12.…”
Section: Decomposabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, any triple which includes a division algebra cannot be obtained from this proposition. Consider for instance the algebra with involution (A, σ ) described in [34,Example 3.6], and let (B, τ ) and (C, γ ) be the two components of its Clifford algebra. As explained there, A is a indecomposable division algebra, and one component of its Clifford algebra, say B, has index 2.…”
Section: Explicit Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using either the proposition in the Appendix of [24], or [3, 3.4(2)], one may easily check that (A, σ) decomposes as…”
Section: When This Isomorphism Holds We Havementioning
confidence: 99%