2009
DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00139-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-Infected and Vaccinated Animals by Use of β-Galactosidase Allosteric Biosensors

Abstract: Recombinant ␤-galactosidases accommodating one or two different peptides from the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) nonstructural protein 3B per enzyme monomer showed a drastic enzymatic activity reduction, which mainly affected proteins with double insertions. Recombinant ␤-galactosidases were enzymatically reactivated by 3B-specific murine monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies. Interestingly, these recombinant ␤-galactosidases, particularly those including one copy of each of the two 3B sequences, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the advantages of such biosensors as diagnostic tools is the homogeneous nature of the assay, the short time required for the enzymatic reaction and antibody detection, and the potential for handling large number of samples and for automatic processing, as shown for human immunodeficiency virus (Ferraz et al, 2006;Ferraz et al, 2008). More recently, allosteric biosensors for detection of the animal foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) have been developed, allowing the differentiation between sera FMDV-infected animals and those of naïve and conventionally vaccinated ones (Sánchez-Aparicio et al, 2009).…”
Section: Biosensors and Fusion Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the advantages of such biosensors as diagnostic tools is the homogeneous nature of the assay, the short time required for the enzymatic reaction and antibody detection, and the potential for handling large number of samples and for automatic processing, as shown for human immunodeficiency virus (Ferraz et al, 2006;Ferraz et al, 2008). More recently, allosteric biosensors for detection of the animal foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) have been developed, allowing the differentiation between sera FMDV-infected animals and those of naïve and conventionally vaccinated ones (Sánchez-Aparicio et al, 2009).…”
Section: Biosensors and Fusion Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Novel Diagnostic Assays. Additional novel diagnostic assays such as biosensors [ 85 ], microarrays [ 86 ], gold nanoparticle (GNP) improved immuno-PCR (GNP-IPCR ) [ 87 ], and nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) [ 88 ] have shown promising ability for rapid and reliable diagnosis, surveillance screening, and strain typing for FMDV for sub-Saharan Africa.Some of the limitations of these assays are that they are yet to beoptimised for the FMDV SAT serotypes with a high degree of sequence variability like Zambia. The costs involved per test will also determine how widely these assays will be used especially for developing countries like Zambia.…”
Section: Challenges Of Controlling Fmd In Zambiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional novel diagnostic assays such as biosensors, 202 microarrays, 203 gold nanoparticle improved immuno-PCR, 204 and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification 205 , 206 have been shown to enable rapid and reliable diagnosis, surveillance screening, and strain typing for FMDV. Although these assays have promising capabilities for sub-Saharan Africa and can improve many of the current problems faced, there are also many limiting factors that prevent the routine use of certain assays.…”
Section: Current and Novel Diagnostic Tests For Field Application In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were consistent within serotypes, and were found to match some of the independently identified antigenic sites in other serotypes. Applying the linear mixed-effect model to SAT1 viruses, two surface-exposed regions of the capsid (ie, VP1 βG-βH (132-174) and VP3 βH-βI (191)(192)(193)(194)(195)(196)(197)(198)(199)(200)(201)(202) loops were identified as better predictors of cross-reactivity between the field virus and vaccine strain 66 than serologically calculated r 1 -values. Both regions were identified by studying MAbresistant mutant viruses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%