Discriminating “impaired” from “disordered” contractile response on FLIP panometry by utilizing pressure measurement

Abstract

BackgroundFunctional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry evaluates esophageal motility, including the contractile response to distension, that is, secondary peristalsis. Impaired/disordered contractile response (IDCR) is an abnormal, but nonspecific contractile response that can represent either hypomotility or spastic motor disorders on high‐resolution manometry (HRM). We hypothesized that FLIP pressure could be incorporated to clarify IDCR and aimed to determine its utility in a cohort of symptomatic esophageal motility patients.Methods173 adult patients that had IDCR on FLIP panometry and HRM with a conclusive Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) diagnosis were included and analyzed as development (n = 118) and validation (n = 55) cohorts. FLIP pressure values were assessed for prediction of either hypomotility or spasm, defined on HRM/CCv4.0.Key ResultsHRM/CCv4.0 diagnoses were normal motility in 48 patients (28%), “hypomotility” (ineffective esophageal motility, absent contractility, or Type I or II achalasia) in 89 (51%), and “spasm” (Type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, or hypercontractile esophagus) in 36 (21%). The pressure at esophagogastric junction‐distensibility index (DI) (60 mL) was lower in hypomotility (median [interquartile range] 34 [28–42] mmHg) than in spasm (49 [40–62] mmHg; p < 0.001) and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.88) for hypomotility and 0.76 (0.69–0.83) for spasm. For “spasm” on HRM, a threshold FLIP pressure of >35 mmHg provided 90% sensitivity (47% specificity) while >55 mmHg provided 93% specificity (40% sensitivity).Conclusion & InferencesPressure on FLIP panometry can help clarify the significance of IDCR, with low‐pressure IDCR associated with hypomotility and high‐pressure IDCR suggestive of spastic motor disorders.