2012
DOI: 10.1130/b30534.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating rapid exhumation from syndepositional volcanism using detrital zircon double dating: Implications for the tectonic history of the Eastern Cordillera, Colombia

Abstract: Lag time is the difference between the closure age of a thermochronologic system and the depositional age of host strata. Lag-time analysis of sedimentary basin fi ll provides insight into the exhumation history of adjacent eroded orogens. In a case study of the Paleogene Floresta basin in the Eastern Cordillera fold-thrust belt of Colombia, variations in lag time refl ect changes in both sediment source areas and exhumation patterns. However, near-zero lag times can be produced by either syndepositional volca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(164 reference statements)
4
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the upper Eocene, lag time increases again. Saylor et al (2012a) interpret, as we do, the presence of a new source area to the west due to the advance of a new thrust sheet. This is in line with the deduced eastward advance of the Pesca-Soapaga thrust system (Figure 2) based on AFT modeling (Figures 7, 10).…”
Section: Late Eocenementioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the upper Eocene, lag time increases again. Saylor et al (2012a) interpret, as we do, the presence of a new source area to the west due to the advance of a new thrust sheet. This is in line with the deduced eastward advance of the Pesca-Soapaga thrust system (Figure 2) based on AFT modeling (Figures 7, 10).…”
Section: Late Eocenementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Bedrock thermochronology for deformed belts of the Andean retroarc system included apatite and zircon fission track analysis (AFT and ZFT, respectively; Parra et al, 2009b;Silva et al, 2013 and Table 2, data from this work) as well as apatite and zircon (U-Th)/ He analysis (AHe and ZHe, respectively) combined with vitrinite reflectance data Parra et al, 2012;Caballero et al, 2013a, b, Table 3). Detrital thermo-and geochronology of intermontane and foreland basin fill included (U-Th)/He analysis of zircons (ZHe) Bande et al, 2012;Saylor et al, 2012a) and zircon U-Pb geochronology Nie et al, 2010Nie et al, , 2012Saylor et al, 2011;Bande et al, 2012;Caballero et al, 2013a, b;Silva et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lanci et al (2013) suggested that the robust single crystal age data presented by Fildani et al (2007Fildani et al ( , 2009) were erroneously young due to Pb-loss. The ages presented in this study are based on zircon age populations (n ≥ 3) to estimate ash ages, greatly minimizing the chances of the age being affected by Pb-loss (Saylor et al 2012), but corroborate, support, and reproduced the age estimates produced by Fildani et al (2007Fildani et al ( , 2009, Coney et al (2007), Weislogel et al (2011), Lanci et al (2013), and Rubidge et al (2013). It is not likely that the zircon ages presented in this study have been affected by Pb-loss because (1) only concordant analyses were considered; (2) ash ages are based on concordant age populations and weighted averages; (3) individual results are repeatable (Fildani et al 2007(Fildani et al , 2009Lanci et al 2013;Rubidge et al 2013); and (4) the observed age inversion is present in both this study and previous studies (Fildani et al 2007(Fildani et al , 2009Coney et al 2007;Weislogel et al 2011;Lanci et al 2013;Rubidge et al 2013) using a variety of analytical techniques (SHRIMP, TIMS, LA-ICPMS) and consistently occurs across the basin directly above the proposed tuff gap.…”
Section: Maximum Depositional Ages From U-pb Zircon Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%