1990
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination and classification of rising and nonrising pitch patterns by the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the original stimuli were designed to discourage the use of absolute cues, there was a partial confound between absolute and relative pitch. When this confound was eliminated, so that only relative pitch information was available, songbirds failed to acquire the discrimination (Braaten, Hulse, & Page, 1990; Page, Hulse, & Cynx, 1989). This suggests that any relative pitch perception may depend on a songbird first identifying the patterns on the basis of their absolute properties.…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Absolute Pitchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the original stimuli were designed to discourage the use of absolute cues, there was a partial confound between absolute and relative pitch. When this confound was eliminated, so that only relative pitch information was available, songbirds failed to acquire the discrimination (Braaten, Hulse, & Page, 1990; Page, Hulse, & Cynx, 1989). This suggests that any relative pitch perception may depend on a songbird first identifying the patterns on the basis of their absolute properties.…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Absolute Pitchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, comparative psychologists have begun to study animals' perceptionof relationships among acoustic elements. A number of experiments have been conducted to study the perception of serial frequency relationships (Braaten, Hulse, & Page, 1990;D 'Amato, 1988;D'Amato & Salmon, 1982, 1984Dooling, Brown, Park, Okanoya, & Soli, 1987;Hulse & Cynx, 1985Hulse, Cynx, & Humpal, 1984;Hulse, Page, & Braaten, 1990b;Page, Hulse, & Cynx, 1989). Such studies have generally involved training animals to discriminate among two or more patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these songbirds preferentially discriminated tonal patterns according to the absolute frequency of the individual element tones in the patterns; they failed to transfer discrimination to a novel frequency range when the training frequency range was shifted. Only when the experimental conditions severely constrained the use of pattern element cues did the songbirds use pitch relations as a secondary strategy (Hulse and Cynx, 1986;Hulse et al, 1984;Braaten et al, 1990). Data like these lead to the conclusion that birds, unlike humans, cannot generalize relative pitch discrimination to new frequencies, thus lacking a conceptual grasp of frequency modulation in complex sounds.…”
Section: Auditory Categorization In Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%