Discrimination based on religion or belief in the field of work

Abstract

The paper aims to research the necessity of the policy and legal protection of freedom of religion at the workplace, as well as to support the prevention of discrimination of the employees on grounds of religion. The sociological and legal normative method regarding the implementation of the international principle of Dignity at Work, accompanied by the integrated and holistic approach in the research, has been applied. The basic research questions are defined as follows - whether the majority, declarative guarantee of freedom of religion by the provisions of the Constitution, as well as by positive legal documents, is sufficient for the protection against religious discrimination in the domain of labour, and how to increase the scope and level of individual protection of freedom of religious expression, in a way not jeopardizing the interests of the employer in the conditions of domination of economic principles in business, as well as in the labour market, in addition establishing a balance with social goals in terms of achieving goals of the sustainable development agenda.

Overtime work as a form of work exploitation

“…89). У том смислу, може се рећи да је развој радног права на међународном плану имао за циљ, између осталог, "хуманизацију рада, као и промовисање једнакости и солидарности" (Turčinović, Bakić, Stojković Zlatanović, 2020, str. 1184).…”

“…On one hand, the review of (distant and more recent) history leads to the understanding that "progress in the limitation of working hours -is it necessary to remind of it -is one of the basic tendencies in the development of (national, comparative and international) labour law" (Kovačević, 2009, p. 89). To that end, it may be said that the development of labour law at the international level was, inter alia, aimed at "labour humanization, as well as the promotion of equality and solidarity" (Turčinović, Bakić, Stojković Zlatanović, 2020, p. 1184). On the other hand, "capitalism has outgrown national frameworks, becoming a supranational worldwide process and relationship, in which only one argument is appreciated, i.e.…”