2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-1963(03)00121-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
476
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 642 publications
(489 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
476
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Degradation is common in the presence of key resources and water sources, which are considered a precondition for grazing under semiarid or arid condition (Fensham et al 1999, Bestelmeyer et al 2006. A typical example of a stable key resource is the forage available in wet meadows located within rangelands (Buttolph and Coppock 2004); in addition, local degradation typically occurs around water sources (Hanan et al 1991), settlements (Sullivan 1999), nomad tents (Evans and Geerken 2004), and stock posts (Zhao et al 2007). Although the presence of key resources or water sources may lead to degradation, this does not necessarily imply that the non-equilibrium concept per se is incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degradation is common in the presence of key resources and water sources, which are considered a precondition for grazing under semiarid or arid condition (Fensham et al 1999, Bestelmeyer et al 2006. A typical example of a stable key resource is the forage available in wet meadows located within rangelands (Buttolph and Coppock 2004); in addition, local degradation typically occurs around water sources (Hanan et al 1991), settlements (Sullivan 1999), nomad tents (Evans and Geerken 2004), and stock posts (Zhao et al 2007). Although the presence of key resources or water sources may lead to degradation, this does not necessarily imply that the non-equilibrium concept per se is incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RESTREND method was used to identify the humaninduced grassland variation, i.e., degradation and restoration (Evans and Geerken, 2004). This method is based on the hypothesis that vegetation growth is determined by climate change.…”
Section: Restrend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the NDVI max determined by climate change, a reference period or region that has no or stable and minimum human influence should be used (Evans and Geerken, 2004). In this study, we selected seven natural reserves in HYR region as the base region to establish the causable relationship of these two variables.…”
Section: Restrend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method takes non-degraded rangeland as a reference through the comparison of characteristic parameters observed directly (such as biomass, vegetation coverage, edible forage, NDVI, NPP, soil physical and chemical properties indices) to analyze the degradation/restoration of rangeland (Numata et al, 2007;Liu and Zha, 2004;Röder et al, 2008); (3) Monitoring rangeland degradation based on time series analysis of remote sensing. In recent years, these methods have caught widespread attention, and mainly include rainfall use efficiency (RUE) (Wessels et al, 2006;Prince et al, 2004;Paruelo et al, 1999;Holm et al, 2003;Gao et al, 2005;Bai et al, 2008a) and residual trends (RESTREND) (Evans and Geerken, 2004;Wessels et al, 2007;Xu et al, 2010;Cao, 2006;Eckert et al, 2015); (4) Local NPP (the actual Net Primary Productivity) Scaling (Wessels et al, 2007;Wessels et al, 2008;Prince et al, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%