2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination Between Defects in Elongation Fidelity and Termination Efficiency Provides Mechanistic Insights into Translational Readthrough

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
126
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an extension of their system, we have attempted to analyze the full range of misreading errors by these tRNAs in S. cerevisiae. We confirm that the highest enzymatic activities reported at codon 245 by Salas-Marco and Bedwell (2005) reflect functional replacement rather than translational error but that half of the other mutants appear to have been incorrectly identified as error prone. For misreading by tRNA Lys UUU at codon 529 we show that, as in E. coli, error frequency is not solely determined by codon d anticodon pairing but rather is influenced by competition for decoding between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs.…”
Section: à4supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using an extension of their system, we have attempted to analyze the full range of misreading errors by these tRNAs in S. cerevisiae. We confirm that the highest enzymatic activities reported at codon 245 by Salas-Marco and Bedwell (2005) reflect functional replacement rather than translational error but that half of the other mutants appear to have been incorrectly identified as error prone. For misreading by tRNA Lys UUU at codon 529 we show that, as in E. coli, error frequency is not solely determined by codon d anticodon pairing but rather is influenced by competition for decoding between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs.…”
Section: à4supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Again, most of these studies measured one or a few distinct errors at different codons, involving different mismatches, and at all three positions of the codondanticodon complex. For example, Salas-Marco and Bedwell (2005) (Salas-Marco and Bedwell 2005). The highest activities they recorded they ascribed to replacement of the wild-type histidine by the encoded mutant amino acid.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported earlier using a dual-luciferase reporter system that in uL11-depleted cells the frequency of reading-through events is elevated. 23 This phenomenon can also be explained by the loss of cognate vs. near-cognate discrimination (as discussed above). In eukaryotic cells, recognition of the STOP codon is subjected to the decoding process analogously to TC recognition, with the eRF1:eRF3:GTP complex (termination ternary complex tTC) as a main player, which structurally mimics TC, where eRF3 works as trGTPase analogously to EF-Tu.…”
Section: Ul11 Involvement In Ribosomal Speed and Accuracymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…22 The in vitro translation elongation rate measured by the poly-phenylalanine synthesis is decreased, whereas the decoding error rate, shown as a higher frequency of misincorporation events measured in vivo by a specific dual-luciferase system, is increased upon uL11 deletion. 23 Although the involvement of eukaryotic uL11 in ribosomal action was documented, the exact impact on the translational apparatus and metabolic fitness is still beyond full understanding. Moreover, apart from the direct role in the translational cycle, many eukaryotic ribosomal proteins were found to play an important role in ribosome biogenesis, a multistep process involving myriads of auxiliary trans-acting factors helping the ribosome to gain its final shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paromomycin is a 4,5 disubstituted aminoglycoside that increases misincorporation and suppresses nonsense mutations in yeast (Palmer et al 1979;Singh et al 1979;Chernoff et al 1994;Salas-Marco and Bedwell 2005). Due to the dramatic differences in the MIC of paromomycin for strains carrying these different rRNA mutations, we first grew strains expressing wild-type, G1645A, or G1645C 18S rRNAs in the presence of 25 mg/mL paromomycin.…”
Section: Decoding Site Mutations Alter Aminoglycoside Resistance In Ymentioning
confidence: 99%