1995
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00040-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
174
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
174
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze the magnitude of TF components, we obtained the TF power for each single response and then averaged across trials. This approach quantifies the total activity (total power) comprising the phase-locked and non-phase-locked fractions of the responserelated activity (for more theoretical explanations, see Kalcher and Pfurtscheller, 1995). For each trial, the time-varying power in a given frequency band was calculated, which was obtained by squaring the absolute value of the convolution of the signal with the complex wavelet.…”
Section: Time-frequency Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the magnitude of TF components, we obtained the TF power for each single response and then averaged across trials. This approach quantifies the total activity (total power) comprising the phase-locked and non-phase-locked fractions of the responserelated activity (for more theoretical explanations, see Kalcher and Pfurtscheller, 1995). For each trial, the time-varying power in a given frequency band was calculated, which was obtained by squaring the absolute value of the convolution of the signal with the complex wavelet.…”
Section: Time-frequency Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, the trial-to-trial variance in oscillatory activity was computed (Kalcher and Pfurtscheller, 1995;Klimesch et al, 1998). This approach effectively removes the contribution of phase-locked activity that is reflected in the average ERP waveform.…”
Section: Analysis Of Stimulus-induced Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this it is helpful to consider the differential contribution of stimulusevoked gamma and beta activity to an average, broad-band ERP waveform (non phase-locked, induced activity is not considered here because it does not contribute to a waveform averaged from multiple single trials: Kalcher and Pfurtscheller, 1995;Klimesch et al, 1998). Figure 7 shows the results of band-pass filtering broad-band auditory-evoked waveforms by two bandpass filters: gamma (30-50 Hz) and beta 1 (12-20 Hz).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Of Sensory Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure removes the average evoked activity from the data (Kalcher and Pfurtscheller, 1995). The sample point variances were then averaged within consecutive time windows of 125 ms starting at stimulus onset and expressed as percentage change relative to the 375-ms prestimulus baseline, with positive percentages denoting power increases and negative percentages denoting power decreases.…”
Section: Induced Band Powermentioning
confidence: 99%