2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89991-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination Effectiveness of Speech Cepstral Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is to calculate the difference between UBM log-likelihood and speaker's loglikelihood as an evaluation criterion. Malegaonka considered that this is a unilateral scoring (ULS) [113,114]. That is, when the models built using speech from a speaker (speaker A) are matched against speech from another speaker (speaker B), they may not return high likelihoods whilst speech from speaker A matched against the models built using speech from speaker B giving high likelihoods.…”
Section: Better Algorithms For Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to calculate the difference between UBM log-likelihood and speaker's loglikelihood as an evaluation criterion. Malegaonka considered that this is a unilateral scoring (ULS) [113,114]. That is, when the models built using speech from a speaker (speaker A) are matched against speech from another speaker (speaker B), they may not return high likelihoods whilst speech from speaker A matched against the models built using speech from speaker B giving high likelihoods.…”
Section: Better Algorithms For Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%