PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/e527352012-026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination learning in paramecia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar cases have been reported in Paramecium, and in this singlecelled organism there have also been many attempts to demonstrate associative learning. Most of these attempts, carried out decades ago, seem to be controversial, but recent evidence suggests that Paramecium can learn to associate between light and electrical stimulations (Armus et al 2006).…”
Section: Expanding the Epigenetics Research Programmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similar cases have been reported in Paramecium, and in this singlecelled organism there have also been many attempts to demonstrate associative learning. Most of these attempts, carried out decades ago, seem to be controversial, but recent evidence suggests that Paramecium can learn to associate between light and electrical stimulations (Armus et al 2006).…”
Section: Expanding the Epigenetics Research Programmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The localized spot configuration we have chosen eliminates any possibility for the paramecia to be aware of the presence of the trap before reaching the spot. It illustrates a pure random search process in the living world for which there is no possibility of self-adaptation in the paramecium behavior 24,25 nor any optimization of possible search parameters before becoming trapped. 26 Population aggregation occurs anyway, even if it is not driven by learning, nor is it the result of any adaptation ͑although we have not repeated the same experiment with paramecia having been trapped before and reintroduced in a clear medium to see if their motion is Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%