Discrimination, Microaggressions, and Perceptions of Institutional Response in an Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

Abstract

IntroductionDiscrimination in the workplace remains a barrier to advancing diversity and inclusion in the physician workforce. This study sought to examine experiences of discrimination, microaggressions, and perceptions of the institution's response in an academic obstetrics and gynecology department. MethodAll obstetrics and gynecology faculty, fellows, and residents were invited to complete an anonymous, Institutional Review Board-approved cross-sectional survey from February through June 2019. The survey incorporated questions from multiple validated tools on discrimination, microaggressions, perceptions of the institution's response, and opportunities for comments. Data are presented as the frequency with percent and were analyzed using Stata (StataCorp, College Station, USA); two of the authors reviewed and deductively coded the qualitative data. ResultsThe response rate was 58% (87/151), with 30% of the respondents identifying as trainees and 75% identifying as female. Thirty respondents (35%) identified as non-Caucasian. Fifty-four respondents (62%) had ever experienced discrimination and 63 (72%) reported ever experiencing microaggressions at work; of those, 14 (22%) experienced microaggressions several times per week. Of the 69 respondents (79%) who experienced microaggressions and/or discrimination, 49 (71%) felt their experiences were due to gender, and 26 (38%) felt that they were due to race/ancestry. Only 41 respondents (59%) felt that the institution was fair to all employees, and 17 (25%) did not believe diversity was managed effectively. ConclusionMost physicians in the department experienced microaggressions or discrimination, with gender or race/ancestry as common inciting factors. A small but notable portion of respondents would prefer the institution to manage diversity differently. These findings merit further investigation about how to address discrimination in academic medicine.

Assessing the Prevalence of Microaggressions in Plastic Surgery Training: A National Survey

“…Similar results were reported in surgeons and anesthesiologists, in which race-related microaggressions were experienced in 81% of racial-minority physicians. 12 Farid et al 23 reported a 31% of racial microaggressions in a cohort of gynecology faculty, fellows, and residents. Our study found that Asian trainees were more likely to be a target of microaggressions compared with White trainees.…”

“…20,21 Racial discrimination has also been reported to be associated with microaggressions. 12,[22][23][24] Racial microaggressions in form of messages that assume inferiority, criminality, and sameness have been described. 2,25,26 Chisholm et al 22 reported that under-represented racial minorities were significantly more likely to experience race-related microaggressions during medical school.…”

Establishing an antiracism framework for dental education through critical assessment of accreditation standards

“…Those experiences can negatively influence student and faculty views on the academic environment as well as the profession. Such experiences may be underreported due to fear of retaliation and/or disbelief that such concerns will be adequately addressed 29,30 . In addition, due to low numbers of HURE students and faculty, even anonymous humanistic surveys may not allow them to voice their concerns.…”

“…CODA, Commission on Dental Accreditation retaliation and/or disbelief that such concerns will be adequately addressed. 29,30 In addition, due to low numbers of HURE students and faculty, even anonymous humanistic surveys may not allow them to voice their concerns.…”