2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of active false targets in multistatic radar using spatial scattering properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the signal model, the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and the jamming‐to‐noise ratio (JNR) can be obtained bySNR=||α2σn2, JNR=||β2σn2. However, considering the implementation of deception jamming does not depend on the power [1], SNR and JNR are assumed the same and defined as target‐to‐noise ratio (TNR) [30]TNR=||α2σn2=β2σn2. To analyse the ultimate localisation performance under different conditions, root mean square error (RMSE) is utilisedRMSE=1Nmci=1Nmcfalse[)(xfalse^p,ixp2+)(yfalse^p,iyp2false], where Nmc denotes Monte Carlo simulation times, )(xp,yp is the exact coordinate of the physical target, and )(xfalse^p,i,yfalse^p,i denotes the estimated coordinate of the physical target.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the signal model, the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and the jamming‐to‐noise ratio (JNR) can be obtained bySNR=||α2σn2, JNR=||β2σn2. However, considering the implementation of deception jamming does not depend on the power [1], SNR and JNR are assumed the same and defined as target‐to‐noise ratio (TNR) [30]TNR=||α2σn2=β2σn2. To analyse the ultimate localisation performance under different conditions, root mean square error (RMSE) is utilisedRMSE=1Nmci=1Nmcfalse[)(xfalse^p,ixp2+)(yfalse^p,iyp2false], where Nmc denotes Monte Carlo simulation times, )(xp,yp is the exact coordinate of the physical target, and )(xfalse^p,i,yfalse^p,i denotes the estimated coordinate of the physical target.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [27], a suppression method against range–velocity joint deception jamming has been devised, which is based on the diversities of target and the consistency (the same source) of false target. According to the spatial diversity [28, 29], discrimination algorithms have been proposed, where correlation test is performed in complete non‐correlated system model [30] and in partial correlated system model [31] by directly using the echoes from different receivers. However, the performance will deteriorate severely for the lack of enough pulse number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method cannot fully explore the amplitude and phase information of receiving signals. In [12–14], deception jamming is discriminated according to the difference between real target echoes and deceptive jamming in spatial scattering properties for distributed radar. In [15], a hierarchical clustering analysis method was utilised to discriminate deceptive targets in a defined amplitude ratio feature space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radar network system employing multiple, widely distributed stations have been shown to offer significant advantages over monostatic radar in various aspects of radar applications, such as moving target detection, direction finding and target localization, which poses a great threat to the stealth airplane, low altitude attack, and anti-radiation missile [1]- [5]. Radar phantom track generation by a group of cooperating ECAVs has received increased attention in the recent past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%