2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0290-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Alicyclobacillus Strains by Lipase and Esterase Fingerprints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…reactivity (19,20,23,75), fragment-based inhibitor design analogous to serine protease fluorogenic SAS libraries (37,39,40), and in vivo imaging of cell type-specific hydrolase activity (24,33).…”
Section: Molecular Fluorogenic Sar Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…reactivity (19,20,23,75), fragment-based inhibitor design analogous to serine protease fluorogenic SAS libraries (37,39,40), and in vivo imaging of cell type-specific hydrolase activity (24,33).…”
Section: Molecular Fluorogenic Sar Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide range of substrates and reactivities present among esterases has necessitated the development of diverse substrate analogs and assays for characterizing in vitro and in vivo esterase activity (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Esterase substrate libraries have been used to rapidly fingerprint and classify various bacterial, fungal, and disease states (19,20,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). High rates of background hydrolysis, however, limit the cellular and high-throughput screening utility of many commonly employed substrates (16,22,25,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%