1982
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of auditory target dimensions in the presence or absence of variation in a second dimension by infants

Abstract: Discrimination of two acoustic dimensions of auditory stimuli, vowel identity and pitch contour, was tested with infants between the ages of 4 and 16 weeks using the high-amplitude sucking (HAS) technique. Discrimination of the vowel dimension and the pitch dimension was tested under two conditions: when a change in the target dimension occurred in the absence of constant variation in a second dimension, and when a change in the target dimension occurred in the presence of constant variation in a second dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
73
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, discrimination performance does not suffer significantly when tokens from multiple talkers are used as opposed to when only tokens from a single talker are used. Hence, like Kuhl and Miller's (1982) finding that irrelevant pitch variation did not significantly interfere with infants' ability to detect a pitch change, the present study found no evidence that talker variability interferes with infants' detection of a phonetic contrast. However, this is not to say that the infants' processing of speech is unaffected by talker variability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Third, discrimination performance does not suffer significantly when tokens from multiple talkers are used as opposed to when only tokens from a single talker are used. Hence, like Kuhl and Miller's (1982) finding that irrelevant pitch variation did not significantly interfere with infants' ability to detect a pitch change, the present study found no evidence that talker variability interferes with infants' detection of a phonetic contrast. However, this is not to say that the infants' processing of speech is unaffected by talker variability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to this measure, t(22) = 0.29. Next, we sought to determine whether a difference between infants in the single and multiple-talker conditions might show up in the time to habituation measure used by Kuhl and Miller' (1982). We collapsed across the three groups in both the single-and multiple-talker conditions since the treatment in each of the groups was similar for the preshift period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations