1974
DOI: 10.2307/3344764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Modulated Beat Tempo by Professional Musicians

Abstract: Thirty professional musicians were presented with 12 stimulus examples consisting of beats produced on a metronome. Initial beat tempo rate (60, 90, 120, and 150 beats per minute) and tempo modulation direction (Decrease, Increase, and Same) comprised the independent variables. Two dependent variables, number of correct responses on modulation directions and time required to discriminate a tempo change, measured the effect of tempo rate and modulation. Subjects correctly identified significantly more Decrease … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the arithmetic task interfered with detection of tempo changes, as was fully expected. In addition, tempo decelerations were easier to detect than accelerations, F(1, 9) = 5.8, p < .04, as observed previously (Kuhn, 1974;Madsen, 1979;Repp, 2001b). The main effect of intention was nonsignificant, which indicates (somewhat surprisingly) that participants did not derive additional perceptual information from any increased asynchrony between their taps and the final sequence tones in the nonadaptive conditions.…”
Section: Perceptual Judgementssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, the arithmetic task interfered with detection of tempo changes, as was fully expected. In addition, tempo decelerations were easier to detect than accelerations, F(1, 9) = 5.8, p < .04, as observed previously (Kuhn, 1974;Madsen, 1979;Repp, 2001b). The main effect of intention was nonsignificant, which indicates (somewhat surprisingly) that participants did not derive additional perceptual information from any increased asynchrony between their taps and the final sequence tones in the nonadaptive conditions.…”
Section: Perceptual Judgementssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…If we can assume that the experimental situation was somewhat stressful (many subjects seemed to be embarrassed or nervous), this could account for the asymmetric error distribution favoring faster reproductions. An additional explanation for this asymmetry comes from experimental findings that people are more likely to perform faster rather than slower (Kuhn, 1977) and are better able to detect tempo decreases rather than increases (Kuhn, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have investigated whether tempo changes in one direction are more easily detected than changes in the other direction. Although several studies have found that decreases in tempo are more readily discriminable than increases (Kuhn, 1974;Madsen, 1979), others have found the reverse (Geringer & Madsen, 1984;Wang & Salzberg, 1984;Yarbrough, 1987). Lastly, Wapnick (1980) has examined people's sensitivity to tempo variations that span over a greater range than that studied in past research.…”
Section: Ettects Of Musical Tempo On Cognitive Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%