2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of moldy peanuts with reference to aflatoxin using FTIR-ATR system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FTIR-ATR techniques have been applied in several different crud materials (Anjos, Campos, Ruiz, & Antunes, 2015;Anjos, Santos, Estevinho, & Caldeira, 2016;Droussi, D'orazio, Provenzano, Hafidi, & Ouatmane, 2009;Kaya-Celiker, Mallikarjunan, Schmale, & Christie, 2014). In fact, in honey it has been described as useful for the automated and highly sensitive botanical origin estimation (Gok, Severcan, Goormaghtigh, Kandemir, & Severcan, 2015), in the development of calibration models for sugar content estimation (Anjos et al, 2015) and for assessing the presence of adulterants (Gallardo-Velázquez, Osorio-Revilla, Loa, & Rivera-Espinoza, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTIR-ATR techniques have been applied in several different crud materials (Anjos, Campos, Ruiz, & Antunes, 2015;Anjos, Santos, Estevinho, & Caldeira, 2016;Droussi, D'orazio, Provenzano, Hafidi, & Ouatmane, 2009;Kaya-Celiker, Mallikarjunan, Schmale, & Christie, 2014). In fact, in honey it has been described as useful for the automated and highly sensitive botanical origin estimation (Gok, Severcan, Goormaghtigh, Kandemir, & Severcan, 2015), in the development of calibration models for sugar content estimation (Anjos et al, 2015) and for assessing the presence of adulterants (Gallardo-Velázquez, Osorio-Revilla, Loa, & Rivera-Espinoza, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7); two of the misclassified samples were false positive (misclassified as moldy, while they are toxic) and 5 of them were false negative (misclassified as toxic while true class was moldy). Apparently, similar secondary metabolites of aflatoxin contributed the spectra and led clustering of two different species together as reported elsewhere (Fischer et al 2006;Kaya-Celiker et al 2014, 2015. The performance analysis was conducted using 36 clean and infected peanut seeds.…”
Section: Discriminant Analysis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These methods required less detection time and preparation time, which could save solvents, samples and cost. In quantitative analysis, partial least‐squares (PLS) regression has usually been combined with IR to evaluate the content of AFB1 in paddy rice (Zhang et al ., ), red chilli powder (Tripathi & Mishra, ), etc ., and the content of AFTs in maize (Lee et al ., ), peanut paste (Kaya‐Celiker et al ., ), etc., through the developed regression models. However, PLS regression could bring false‐negative and false‐positive results in prediction intervals of AFB1 / AFTs content, which is not a risk in qualitative analysis (Montgomery, ; Brereton, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%