2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-017-3051-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Olive Oil by Cultivar, Geographical Origin and Quality Using Potentiometric Electronic Tongue Fingerprints

Abstract: correct prediction (repeated K-fold cross-validation) of the geographic production region with sensitivities of 92 ± 7% (Chemlali) and 97 ± 8% (Sahli). It was also confirmed the electronic tongue capability to classify Tunisian olive oil according to olive cultivar or quality grade. The results indicated the possible use of potentiometric fingerprints as a promising innovative strategy for olive oil analysis allowing assessing geographical origin, olive cultivar and quality grade, which are key factors determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harzalli et al Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 144 (2018) 222-231 the potentiometric E-tongue capability to detect adulterated EVOO due to the intentionally addition of different percentages of LOO-R or LOO-WV, was evaluated using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with the meta-heuristic simulated annealing (SA) variable selection algorithm (Bertsimas and Tsitsiklis, 1992;Kirkpatrick et al, 1983;Cadima et al, 2004). The electrochemical-chemometric strategy followed was similar to previous works of the research team Rodrigues et al, 2016;Veloso et al, 2016Veloso et al, , 2018Marx et al, 2017aMarx et al, , 2017bMarx et al, , 2017cSlim et al, 2017;Souayah et al, 2017). The signal profiles generated during the electrochemical analysis of the hydro-ethanolic extracts of non-adulterated and intentionally-adulterated olive oils were subjected to a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in combination with a meta-heuristic simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, in order to establish predictive E-tongue-LDA-SA models capable of classifying olive oil according to their adulteration level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harzalli et al Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 144 (2018) 222-231 the potentiometric E-tongue capability to detect adulterated EVOO due to the intentionally addition of different percentages of LOO-R or LOO-WV, was evaluated using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with the meta-heuristic simulated annealing (SA) variable selection algorithm (Bertsimas and Tsitsiklis, 1992;Kirkpatrick et al, 1983;Cadima et al, 2004). The electrochemical-chemometric strategy followed was similar to previous works of the research team Rodrigues et al, 2016;Veloso et al, 2016Veloso et al, , 2018Marx et al, 2017aMarx et al, , 2017bMarx et al, , 2017cSlim et al, 2017;Souayah et al, 2017). The signal profiles generated during the electrochemical analysis of the hydro-ethanolic extracts of non-adulterated and intentionally-adulterated olive oils were subjected to a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in combination with a meta-heuristic simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, in order to establish predictive E-tongue-LDA-SA models capable of classifying olive oil according to their adulteration level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature survey clearly point out the limited number of works reporting the successful use of E-noses (Oliveros et al, 2002;Jeleń, 2008, 2010;Lerma-García et al, 2010;Santonico et al, 2015) to detect olive oil adulteration with other vegetable oils or lower quality olive oils (possessing or not common sensory defects), as well as the scarce use of voltammetric E-tongues (Apetrei and Apetrei, 2014;Santonico et al, 2015). Recently, the use of a pontentiometric E-tongue device comprising cross-sensitivity lipid polymeric membranes, has demonstrated to be a practical and helpful taste sensor tool for olive oil analysis (Dias et al, 2014Veloso et al, 2016Veloso et al, , 2018Slim et al, 2017;Souayah et al, 2017). It was previously reported by Marx et al (2017b) and Slim et al (2017) the capability of this type of E-tongue to provide quantitative potentiometric responses towards aldehydes, alcohols and esters compounds that mimic positive olive oil sensory attributes namely, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanilla sensation), hexyl acetate (sweet, green, grassy, fruity or apple sensations), (Z)-hex-3-en-1-ol (green leaves or banana sensations), (E)-hex-2-enal (green, almonds or apple sensations), (Z)-hex-3-enyl acetate (fruity or green leaves sensations), citric and tartaric acids (acid sensation), caffeine and quinine (bitter sensations) and sodium or potassium chloride (salty sensation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models had the most representative and non-collinear sub-sets of sensor signal profiles that were selected, in each case, by applying the simulated annealing (SA) meta-heuristic algorithm. This algorithm has proven to be a powerful variable selection algorithm, for both qualitative Dias et al, 2014;Slim et al, 2017;Souayah et al, 2017;Veloso et al, 2018Veloso et al, , 2016 and quantitative ) evaluation of olive oil using potentiometric taste sensor devices. The quality criterions involved the maximization of the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and the minimization of the root-mean-square error (RMSE) for the lowest number of sensors with non-collinear potentiometric signals responses, based on the results achieved for the leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation (CV) procedure (Cadima, Cerdeira, & Minhoto, 2004;Cadima, Cerdeira, Silva, & Minhoto, 2012;Cortez, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the search for methods which enable to verify geographical origin and authenticity of olive oils has been the object of numerous studies in the past few years. Different targeted and non‐targeted approaches as well as different analytical techniques in combination with multivariate data analysis were applied for this purpose: While some studies focused on the analysis of specific compounds like sterols, carotinoids, tocopherols, isotope ratios, volatiles, and phenolic compounds, other studies used the so called “chemical fingerprints” of olive oils analyzed by gas and liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, spectroscopic techniques (NMR, NIR, MIR, and Raman fluorescence) or potentiometric electronic nose . The combination of the determination of phenolic compounds, sterols or other minor compounds with fatty acid (FA) patterns is also proposed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%