1982
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.77.3.664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of productive and nonproductive porphyritic intrusions in the Chilean Andes

Abstract: A geochemical comparison between productive intrusions (those associated with mineralization) and nonproductive intrusions (those unrelated to mineralization) has been made on the basis of over 100 fresh granitoid rocks from the Chilean porphyry copper belt. The study was carried out on the scale of a mining district (El Salvador-Potrerillos), then on the scale of a single traverse (El Salvador-Chilean coast), and finally on the scale of the Andes itself. The productive intrusions are best characterized by lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This depletion is typical of a calcalkaline magmatism in a subduction zone environment. The Nb versus Y, and Rb versus Y+Nb diagrams (figure 20) further confirm that the Karakoram granitoids are both volcanic arc granites (VAG) and syn-collision granites (Syn-COLG), hence comparing to the continental arc plutonism of the Chile arc [32].…”
Section: Geochemistry' Of the Tirit Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This depletion is typical of a calcalkaline magmatism in a subduction zone environment. The Nb versus Y, and Rb versus Y+Nb diagrams (figure 20) further confirm that the Karakoram granitoids are both volcanic arc granites (VAG) and syn-collision granites (Syn-COLG), hence comparing to the continental arc plutonism of the Chile arc [32].…”
Section: Geochemistry' Of the Tirit Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Here, we focus on geochemical data for Cu-bearing porphyries associated with the subduction of oceanic crust that formed during two major phases of metallogenesis in the eastern Pacific. The first phase, in the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene, was associated with the formation of the Laramide porphyry province in Arizona (e.g., Lang and Titley, 1998), the Mezcala porphyry province in Mexico (e.g., González-Partida et al, 2003), the El Salvador deposit in the Chilean Porphyry Cu belt (e.g., Baldwin and Pearce, 1982), and the Bingham mining district in Utah (e.g., Stavast et al, 2006).…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Distribution Of Porphyry Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPEPR deposits are generally associated with diorite, granodiorite, quartz diorite, quartz monzonites, and granite (e.g., Baldwin and Pearce, 1982;Lang and Titley, 1998;González-Partida et al, 2003). In contrast, the majority of the MPEPR deposits are associated with andesite, monzodiorite, granodiorite, quartz diorites, monzonite and dacite (e.g., Müller and Forrestal, 1998;Reich et al, 2003;Cannell et al, 2005;Schutte et al, 2010;Stern et al, 2010;Vry et al, 2010).…”
Section: Major and Trace Element Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Wang et al (2007), for instance, suggest a fO 2 reduction by slab melts below South America. Then it might be suggested that some of the preferential associations observed between certain adakitic magmas and major gold deposits (e.g., [Baldwin and Pearce, 1982], [Thiéblemont et al, 1997], [Sajona and Maury, 1998], [Gonzalez-Partida et al, 2003], [Levresse et al, 2004] and [Rae et al, 2004]) may be related to a greater availability of gold in the magma source(s).…”
Section: Importance Of Intensive Parameters and Magma Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of a link between economic deposits and alkaline arc magmas has been demonstrated in Papua-New Guinea (Richards, 1990). In other cases, a preferential relationship has been noted between adakitic magmatism and Au-Ag-Cu-Mo epithermal and porphyry deposits ( [Baldwin and Pearce, 1982], [Thiéblemont et al, 1997], [Sajona and Maury, 1998], [Gonzalez-Partida et al, 2003], [Levresse et al, 2004] and [Rae et al, 2004]), although such an association remains doubtful to some authors (e.g., Richards and Kerrich, 2007). The origin of a potential connection between adakitic magmas and epithermal and porphyry-type deposits is the central question addressed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%