1996
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95636-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of sleep stages: a comparison between spectral and nonlinear EEG measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
1
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
106
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This entropy measure has already been used in sleep EEG signal processing, yielding high values in wakefulness and REM sleep stages, and low values in N3 stages [28]. Shannon entropy was calculated for each channel independently (features ψ 9 and ψ 10 ).…”
Section: Shannon Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entropy measure has already been used in sleep EEG signal processing, yielding high values in wakefulness and REM sleep stages, and low values in N3 stages [28]. Shannon entropy was calculated for each channel independently (features ψ 9 and ψ 10 ).…”
Section: Shannon Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides alpha power, 9 different EEG measures were evaluated, including 7 spectral (frequency based) measures plus the nonlinear measures correlation dimension D2 and Lyapunov-exponent L1 (see e.g., Fell et al, 1996). The calculation of all spectral measures was based on FFTs using cosine windowing in the time domain (window length = 5.12 s).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral entropy is evaluated using the normalized Shannon entropy, which quantifies the spectral complexity of the time series [16,17]. Spectral entropy uses the power spectrum of the signal to estimate the regularity of time series; its amplitude components are used to compute the probabilities in entropy computation.…”
Section: Spectral Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%