2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative Ability of Heel Quantitative Ultrasound in Postmenopausal Women With Prevalent Low-Trauma Fractures: Application of Optimal Threshold Cutoff Values Using CART Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of salivary calcium in this study were similar to those of the QUS test (sensitivity 68, specificity 70 and AUC 0.72%). Nevertheless, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of digital X‐ray radiogrammetry (DXR) and radiographic absorptiometry (RA) were higher than the corresponding values for salivary calcium …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of salivary calcium in this study were similar to those of the QUS test (sensitivity 68, specificity 70 and AUC 0.72%). Nevertheless, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of digital X‐ray radiogrammetry (DXR) and radiographic absorptiometry (RA) were higher than the corresponding values for salivary calcium …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated information obtained by QUS can represent a reasonable alternative because bone structural quality may conflict with measurement of BMD which only detects bone density. 16 , 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 , 14 Taken together, these findings suggest that QUS, unlike BMD, could possibly evaluate bone quality, especially microarchitecture, and therefore be useful for assessing fracture risk. 15 Most studies aimed to evaluate the role of the heel QUS in osteoporosis diagnosis were performed in elderly osteoporotic woman 16 ; other studies have considered populations characterized mainly by poor bone quality. 17 , 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, in this study, CAR as a composite indicator has a multicollinearity relationship with CRP and albumin, which may lead to the wrong identification of relevant predictors in regression analysis 14 Classification and regression tree (CART), as a data mining technique, is ideally suitable for the generation of clinical rules, which often enables the detection of complex interactions between predictors (including predictors with multicollinearity), which may be difficult or impossible to uncover using traditional statistical techniques 15 CART has been shown to perform as well or better than other traditional statistical techniques, such as logistic regression analysis, and is increasingly being applied to diagnose disease and predict outcomes or complications in patients, including diabetes, trauma, and cancer. [16][17][18][19] To the best of our knowledge, CART analysis has not previously been used to assess the predictors of AL in patients after esophagectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%